NUR 699 Week 3 Complete Work Nursing Essays

NUR 699 Week 3 Complete Work Nursing Essays

NUR699

NUR 699 GC Week 3 Discussion 1

What levels of evidence are present in relation to research and practice, and why it is important regardless of the method you use?

 

NUR 699 GC Week 3 Discussion 2

What factors must be assessed when critically appraising quantitative studies (e.g., validity, reliability, and applicability)? Which is the most important? Why?

NUR 699 GC Week 3 Assignment

Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section C: Literature Support

Details:

To begin, work through the reference list that was created in the “Section B: Problem Description” assignment in Topic 2. Appraise each resource using the “Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklists,” available in the textbook appendix. The specific checklist you use will be determined by the type of evidence within the resource.

Develop a research table to organize and summarize the research studies. Using a summary table allows you to be more concise in your narrative description. Only research studies used to support your intervention are summarized in this table. Refer to the “Evaluation Table Template,” available in the textbook appendix. Use the “Evaluation Table Template” as an adaptable template.

Write a narrative of 750-1,000 words (not including the title page and references) that presents the research support for the projects problem and proposed solution. Make sure to do the following:

1. Include a description of the search method (e.g., databases, keywords, criteria for inclusion and exclusion, and number of studies that fit your criteria).
2. Summarize all of the research studies used as evidence. The essential components of each study need to be described so that readers can evaluate its scientific merit, including study strengths and limitations.
3. Incorporate a description of the validity of the internal and external research.

It is essential to make sure that the research support for the proposed solution is sufficient, compelling, relevant, and from peer-reviewed professional journal articles.

Although you will not be submitting the checklist information or the evaluation table you design in Topic 3 with the narrative, the checklist information and evaluation table should be placed in the appendices for the final paper.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Upon receiving feedback from the instructor, refine “Section C: Literature Support” for your final submission. This will be a continuous process throughout the course for each section.

NUR 699 Week 3 Complete Work Nursing Essays

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION;

What factors must be assessed when critically appraising quantitative studies

Introduction

When you read a study, you want to know whether the findings are reliable and valid. Quantitative research is often discussed in terms of these two concepts: reliability and validity. These are important considerations, but they don’t tell the whole story. A more thorough understanding of how well a study was done will help you better understand what it found and how reliable that finding might be.

Sample selection and representation

Sample selection and representation are two of the most important aspects of a quantitative research study. The sample should be representative of the population, or at least as large as possible. It’s also important that you choose a random sample, or at least systematically, so that your results can be generalized to other populations with similar characteristics.

If there’s no mention in your paper about why you chose particular individuals from whom to draw data, then readers may not trust your conclusions; they’ll wonder if these were biased based on who was included and excluded from your research team – which could lead them down a path towards incorrect conclusions themselves (e.g., “some people aren’t good drivers”).

Appropriateness of the design

• Randomisation: The randomisation procedure for the selection of participants and setting up of experimental or control conditions should be specified in detail. In general, randomisation is important for two reasons. First, it reduces bias due to confounding factors (e.g., group differences in sociodemographics). Second, it increases internal validity by reducing Hawthorne effects and other artifacts that may occur when participants are kept under observation for long periods of time during an experiment (e.g., fatigue).

• Control groups: It is important that there are control groups because they allow us to measure any observed effects on our outcomes against what would have occurred if there were no intervention at all – which we cannot do with just one treatment group adhered to strict rules such as blinding procedures etcetera

Research question and hypothesis

A clear research question and hypothesis are essential to the development of a sound study. The following guidelines can help you to write a clear research question:

• Be specific. The more specific the question, the easier it is for others to answer. For example, “How does infant mortality differ between countries with different rates of maternal death?” is better than “How does infant mortality change across time?”

• Use descriptive statistics and graphs when possible. Graphs allow you to see relationships between variables and make them easier for readers to grasp what’s happening in your data set.

Valid and reliable data collection methods

The next step in the critical appraisal process is valid and reliable data collection methods. This includes ensuring that the research question, participants, setting and design are appropriate for collecting quantitative data.

Valid means that the results are accurate (e.g., not biased) based on sound reasoning or observation. Reliable means that it is possible to reproduce the same results by using a different group of people at different times; otherwise known as replication studies

Ethics

• Use of human subjects. Informed consent has been defined as “a process by which a person makes an informed decision to participate in a research study” (Institute of Medicine, 2001). It is important that the subject or subjects understand what they are agreeing to and why they are being asked to participate. It must be clear that there will be no harm or discomfort involved, but also that they can withdraw from the study at any time without penalty.

• Protection of privacy and confidentiality. The information used in a quantitative study will often include personal details such as names, addresses and phone numbers; this may have implications for privacy issues when seeking funding for future research projects through either government grants or commercial companies such as pharmaceutical manufacturers who may want access to this data at some point in order for them (or their competitors) make better decisions about which products would work best based on what consumers want most from their healthcare services (i..e., prevention rather than treatment). Therefore it’s important not only protect your own rights but also those who depend upon you financially for example: if someone were suffering from cancer then perhaps we wouldn’t want anyone else knowing about how much money we earn each year so maybe don’t tell anyone outside family members etcetera . . .

Evidence of peer review and publication in a recognised journal

The quality of a study depends on the rigour of its methods, the validity of its results and their interpretation. The primary means by which studies are evaluated is through peer review. This process involves independent experts in the field reviewing a manuscript prior to publication.

The journal you publish your research in must be recognised by your university or organisation as having high standards for publication work. The journal will have an editorial board that oversees all aspects of production from submission through to publication (see [1]). These editors ensure that submissions conform to established technical standards; reviewers comment on whether or not a paper is suitable for publication; and authors return revisions following feedback from reviewers or corrections made as a result of reviews comments provided during editorial screening processes

You need to consider the issue of how well the research is done.

You need to consider the issue of how well the research is done. The quality of a study will depend on its design and methods used.

• Sample size, selection and representation: A large sample size with representative participants is more likely to produce accurate results than a small one that lacks adequate representation from all groups (e.g., young people, older adults). For example, if you have an online survey with 100 respondents aged between 18 and 24 years old who are from Australia but also live in New Zealand or Europe then there may be some differences in your findings compared with those for an internet survey conducted among all Australians aged 25 years+.

Conclusion

These are just some of the things that you need to consider when critically appraising a quantitative study. There are many more that could be mentioned, but these seven are the most important ones in my opinion.