HLT 520 Complete Week Assignments Paper

HLT 520 Complete Week Assignments Paper

Week 1 Ethical Study Review Latest-GCU

Details:

Scenario: A 96-year-old male patient is admitted to the ICU with terminal liver cancer. He is confused and disoriented, very skinny and appears underfed, and is covered with bruises, which are common in patients with liver disorders. His daughter, who is a naturopathic physician, insists that she can cure her father by administering unknown substances, some of which smell like feces and look like tar, down his NG tube. He is clearly in pain after she does this. She insists that these are life-saving interventions on her part, but the nursing and physician staff caring for the patient are very upset and concerned that she is hastening his death. They have come to you for help.

1) Write a paper (1,250-1,500 words) that describes how to use the method of ethical decision making, reviewed in the module, to help resolve this ethical dilemma. Address the following to generate your conclusions about how you would proceed:

1. a) What are the dimensions of the ethical dilemma?
2. b) What are the issues?
3. c) Apply the four core ethical principles and the process of ethical decision making.

2) Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

3) This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

 

Week 2 Law Suit Recommendation Paper Latest-GCU

Details:

Scenario: A physician is claiming injury and damages from a hospital that notified him they were not renewing his contract for services provided. The hospital gave him a 4-month notice and stated that they were exercising this right because they wanted the department in which the physician functioned “to go in a new direction.” The physician has filed notice of intention to sue.

1) As the hospital administrator, write a paper (750-1,000-words) that explores the options for defending the suit in court, going to arbitration, going to mediation, or structuring a settlement. Include the pros and cons of each option and end with a recommendation to your board of directors on which avenue to pursue.

2) Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

3) This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment

HLT 520 Week 2 Respondeat Superior Paper Latest-GCU

Details:

Scenario: A patient had surgery and the nurse-anesthetist administered the anesthesia. The patient subsequently arrested and died while under anesthesia. An investigation concluded that the patient was not receiving the needed amount of oxygen and the nurse-anesthetist missed the changes in the vital signs until the patient was close to cardiac arrest. The surgeon initially had assisted in positioning the patient and had helped to administer some of the initial anesthetic.

1) Write an analysis (750-1,000 words) of the situation and argue whether the doctrine of “respondeat superior” would cause the surgeon to have vicarious liability for the patient’s death.

2) Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

3) This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment

HLT 520 Week 3 Assignment Latest-GCU

Details:

1) Read the case study, “Hospital’s Duty to Ensure Competency” on pages 183-184 in the textbook.

2) Write a paper (1,250-1,500 words) that addresses the case study’s two Discussion prompts. Include a detailed rationale for your answers.

3) Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

4) This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

HLT 520 Week 4 Assignment Latest-GCU

Details:

Scenario: You are the administrator on call for a local hospital and you receive a call at 2:00 a.m. from another local hospital regarding a patient with a broken upper arm. The ED physician’s assistant is calling to arrange an EMTALA transfer from his hospital to yours, but the orthopedic physician on call at your hospital is refusing to accept the transfer, stating that the patient doesn’t need a higher level of care. When you ask him about that, he tells you the fracture is not displaced, and can be splinted and seen in the office. The ED physician at your hospital is very nervous about the possibility of an EMTALA violation.

1) Write an analysis (1,000-1,500 words) of the situation, how it is impacted by EMTALA, and what decision you will make as the administrator, along with your rationale and thought process.

2) Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

3) This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

HLT 520 Week 5 Assignment Latest-GCU

Details:

1) Read the case study (“Contract Violates Antitrust Laws”) on pages 100-101 in the textbook and answer the two discussion questions.

2) Write a paper (1,000-1,500 words) that addresses the discussion questions. Include a detailed rationale for your answers.

3) Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

4) This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

HLT 520 Week 6 Chapter 20 Review Questions Latest-GCU

Details:

1) Write a paper (500-750 words) that addresses the Review Questions 2 and 3 in chapter 20 of the textbook. Include a rationale for your answers.

2) Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

3) This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

HLT 520 Week 7 Brain Death Scenario Assignment Latest-GCU

Details:

Scenario: You are the hospital administrator and are told by your ICU unit director of a patient in the unit that has suffered serious brain damage, but is not currently meeting the criteria for complete brain death. Half of the family is insisting that the patient “wouldn’t want to live this way” and the other half is accusing them of wanting to kill the patient. Some allegations have been raised about a substantial inheritance for some family members upon the patient’s death. The battle is becoming intense and it is beginning to disrupt the medical and nursing staff.

1) Write an analysis (1,250-1,500 words) of the situation from an ethical and legal perspective. Address the following questions:HLT 520 Complete Week Assignments Paper

1. a) What are the ethical issues?
2. b) What are the legal issues?
3. c) What are the medical care issues?
4. d) What actions would you take? Why? How?
5. e) What resources would you tap?

2) Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

3) This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

HLT 520 Week 8 Bioethics Interview Assignment Latest-GCU

Details:

1) Contact the chair of a local hospital’s bioethics committee and interview him/her regarding the use of the committee at that facility, how the committee functions, how it makes decisions and recommendations, and the chair’s views on the impact the committee has had on the facility. If possible, attend one of the committee’s meetings.

2) Write a paper (1,250-1,500 words) that describes your findings and observations. Include additional resources that support, reinforce, or even challenge your findings and observations.

3) Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

4) This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

HLT 520 Complete Week Assignments Paper

 

MORE INFO 

The dimensions of ethical dilemma in healthcare

Introduction

We all like to think we are good people. But what do you do when you are faced with a moral dilemma? What comes first: your morals or your job? In healthcare ethics have always been a grey area and ethical dilemmas can sometimes be hard to define. But as long as you know what is right, then there is no question that it is better to err on the side of caution than risk doing something wrong because of fear or ignorance.

About

An ethical dilemma is a situation where you are faced with a choice between two or more options that may be conflicting. If a patient has been admitted to hospital and requires surgery, there are several factors involved in deciding on the procedure. It could be their age or medical condition that determines which treatment is appropriate but also how much pain they will have to endure during recovery time after surgery.

The dimensions of ethical dilemmas in healthcare include:

• Whether it’s right/wrong – Is what we’re doing right or wrong?

• What can be done differently – Is there something else we could do instead?

• How long does it take – How long does it take before we can change our actions again if necessary (e.g., changing patient outcomes).

Ethical Dilemmas in Healthcare: Introduction

A dilemma is a situation in which there are conflicting moral obligations. Ethical dilemmas arise when there are two or more mutually exclusive choices, each with its own set of associated ethical principles. This can be applied to healthcare in the form of situations where patients want to be treated based on the severity of their illness and not because they have insurance or money to pay for treatment; however, this doesn’t always work out well as there may be no other option than to treat them regardless because they’re so sick.

Ethical dilemmas in healthcare, a case

The case of ethical dilemmas in healthcare

The patient is a young woman who has been suffering from depression for the past five years. She has tried various medications, but none have worked. She also sees a therapist once weekly to help her deal with her symptoms and understand what she needs to do next. One day, she comes into the office complaining about how she feels like there is no hope left for her life; her doctor tells them that he thinks it would be best if they put her on medication again since he believes it will work better than any other treatment method out there (and this patient agrees). However, another member of staff at their clinic does not agree with this decision because they believe there are other options available that might help get rid of some underlying issues instead of just treating symptoms – such as reaching out to family members outside work hours or maybe even getting professional counseling services themselves!

Exploring the ethical dilemmas

When you are faced with an ethical dilemma, it is important to consider the following questions:

• What are the possible outcomes of my actions?

• How does this affect others in a way that I am not aware of or cannot predict?

• What will be the impact on future generations if I do not act?

A different approach to ethical dilemma in Healthcare

The ethical dilemma is a fundamental concept in healthcare. It can be defined as an issue that poses a moral conflict between two or more parties, or between the patient and doctor, where there is no clear right answer. An ethical dilemma can be resolved by using one of the following approaches:

• Consensus – this approach involves reaching agreement through discussion with other stakeholders involved in the decision-making process (e.g., clinicians).

• Exclusionary – this approach excludes certain individuals from participating in discussions about an ethical dilemma because they cannot contribute positively to its resolution (e.g., patients must agree to participate before being treated).

• Reluctant consent – this approach allows individuals who would otherwise be excluded from deliberations on ethical dilemmas but who have been legally granted authority over others’ bodies (e..g., physicians) so long as they are willing participants who will act ethically while under their control (e..g., surgeons).

the ethical dilemma process

The ethical dilemma process is a series of steps that helps you identify and analyze the ethical dilemma. The process begins with an objective assessment of situations, followed by a careful evaluation of options and perspectives. In this section we will examine each step in detail:

• Step 1: Read carefully through the article or study that contains your ethical dilemma question. You may want to take notes while reading it so as not to miss any details or important information about it (such as how long it took for someone else’s research paper). This step also allows you time for reflection on what type of answers would be most useful when trying solve this problem yourself!

Takeaway:

After reading this article, you should be able to identify the ethical dilemma in healthcare. You should also know how to approach it and what steps to take when faced with a situation like this. In addition, you will have gained some insight into why people may choose one option over another when faced with an ethical dilemma.

Conclusion

As you can see, ethical dilemmas in healthcare are a real problem. In fact, they pose one of the greatest challenges facing healthcare professionals today. This is why we need to be aware of them and how they affect our practice. If you’re interested in learning more about ethical dilemmas as well as other topics related to healthcare, visit our website today!