NUR 504 Week 4 Discussion Paper

NUR 504 Week 4 Discussion Paper

NUR 504 Week 4 Complete Latest

NUR504

NUR 504 Week 4 Discussions 1

Read the section Questionnaires versus Interviews on pages 305-306 in the textbook. How are these guidelines similar and different from data collected by nurses when giving care? What principles did you identify that are new to you but could be important in improving your collection of clinical data?

NUR 504 Week 4 Discussions 2

You are interested in nurses’ attitudes toward EBP. Which method do you think would work best to obtain this information: a questionnaire, a face-to-face interview, or a group interview? Defend your answer.

 

NUR 504 Week 4 CLC EBP Identification Latest

NUR504 Week 4 Collaborative Learning Community: EBP Identification Latest

This is a CLC assignment.

Follow the instructions provided in “CLC Assignment: Evidence-Based Project (EBP).”

Utilize the Synthesis Table, Table of Evidence and EBA Project Evaluation Tool to complete your CLC assignment. Submit these documents in Topic 5 as the CLC assignment.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

NUR 504 Week 4 Critique of Research Studies – Part 1 Latest

Follow the instructions provided in Critique of Research Studies Instructions.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin, unless otherwise directed by your instructor. If so directed, refer to the Student Success Center for directions. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.

Critique of Research Studies Instructions

Directions:

Complete a critique of the quantitative and qualitative articles that were submitted in Module 3.

This assignment will be completed in three parts. Refer to the information below as a guide to the information that should be included in each part.

Follow the guidelines for the quantitative and qualitative article critiques in Chapter 5, Box 5.2, pages 112-114 and Box 5.3, pages 115-117 of the textbook.

1) Utilize a central heading to indicate that what follows is the critique of the articles.

2) The side headings of the critique for each article should follow the headings in Box 5.2 and 5.3.

3) Note that within these BASIC guidelines, there are additional references to Detailed Critiquing Guidelines found in various boxes in chapters focused on the various elements of a research study report. Use these to expand the research study and to learn specific terminology appropriate to the critique of research.

When turning in the final submission, please put in the the following order: Quantitative Article Critique, Qualitative Article Critique, References (should include the two articles, the text, and any other additional sources).

Critique of Research Studies – Part 1: Due Module 4

For Part 1 of the critique, focus only on the following segments for each article:

Quantitative       Qualitative

• Title    • Title
• Abstract           • Abstract
• Introduction   • Introduction

o Statement of the problem       o Statement of the problem

o Hypotheses or research questions       o Research questions

o Literature review         o Literature review

o Conceptual/theoretical framework      o Conceptual underpinnings

 

ADDITIONAL DETAILS 

Questionnaires versus Interviews

Introduction

Questionnaires and interviews are both popular ways to collect data in a survey or interview. However, there are some differences between the two that you need to consider before deciding which one is best for your project. In this post, we’ll discuss how each type of questionnaire works and what advantages it has over interviews.

Questionnaires are less expensive to administer.

Questionnaires are less expensive to administer. If a survey involves fewer than 100 surveys, it’s often cheaper to mail them out than it is for one interviewer at your company to administer the questionnaire. Plus, you can send out surveys in bulk and save money on postage by using a mailer that includes multiple envelopes instead of just one.

Interviews can be more flexible than questionnaires.

Interviews can be more flexible than questionnaires. Interviewers don’t have to worry about filtering out responses that don’t fit their categories, and they can ask follow-up questions to clarify ambiguous responses. They also have more leeway in probing for more detail, so they may ask you what made you select one answer over another or why your opinion changed over time. In addition, interviewers have a better sense of the context in which decisions are made: if someone is asked to rate something on a five-point scale, they know whether it was done with an open mind or based on personal preference (and therefore may not necessarily be as reliable).

Questionnaires are usually anonymous.

Questionnaires are usually anonymous. This means that respondents are not identified and they do not need to provide identifying information. They can answer questions without fear of being identified, which reduces the risk of social desirability bias (when people give answers they want others to agree with).

Interviews can be more personal.

Interviews can be more personal.

Interviewers often ask questionnaires to gather information about a candidate’s experience, skills and education but they rarely ask you anything that is not directly related to the job at hand. The interviewer may ask questions like “What is your favorite color?” or “What’s your favorite movie?” These types of questions are useful for determining whether you fit in with their team culture, but they don’t reveal much about how you would perform on the job. On an interview however, an interviewer will talk about what makes him/her tick and why he/she wants this position filled by asking questions designed specifically for getting inside information from candidates who meet certain criteria (e.g., being bilingual). This kind of one-on-one interaction provides more context than typical interviews do because it allows both parties involved ownership over their role throughout the process together creating greater trust between both parties which leads up towards mutual respect during future interactions thereafter.”

Questionnaires are easier to evaluate.

You’ve probably seen questionnaires before. They’re a common form of feedback that can be used to evaluate employee performance, customer satisfaction, and many other things. Questionnaires are typically scored by computer programs and then provided back to the people who completed them in an email or through some other means.

Questionnaire scores can be compared against each other based on certain criteria (such as how many questions were answered correctly) which makes it possible for businesses to identify trends in their employees’ performance over time—and even spot new areas for improvement!

There are also ways you can use questionnaires as part of your own work experience too: if you want feedback about something specific such as what kind of role suits your personality best; how well do my skills match up with this job description; etc., all these questions need answers from someone else first before being put into actionable forms such as automated emails sent out via HR software systems like Kronos Workforce Management Suite™ (KWS).

Interviews can be more time-consuming for the researcher.

Interviews can be more time-consuming for the researcher. The researcher has to prepare for the interview, make sure that it is conducted properly and analyze data afterward.

Questionnaires are easier for respondents to complete.

Questionnaires are easier for respondents to complete.

Questionnaires have the advantage of allowing respondents to select their own order of questions, which can make it easier for them to answer. If you’re asking a series of questions in a single questionnaire, there’s no need for an interviewer who has set up everything beforehand—the researcher can just ask them one after another and record their responses as they go along (this is called “batched interviewing”). It also means that if you don’t get all your data right away, it won’t matter too much; by next week or month or however long these surveys take place over time, when they’re finally done with them (and maybe even published!), then everyone will be able to see how people answered at each step along the way!

Interviews may have greater validity.

Interviews may have greater validity.

Interviews can be more accurate than questionnaires because they allow the researcher to ask follow-up questions and assess the respondent’s body language. They also allow researchers to ask for clarification on any ambiguous statements made by respondents, which is especially helpful when trying to understand complex topics such as culture and religion.

Each has its pros and cons, but questionnaires are easier in most ways

Each has its pros and cons, but questionnaires are easier in most ways.

Questionnaires can be much more cost-effective than interviews because they’re less time-consuming for the researcher. A questionnaire takes about 5–10 minutes to complete, whereas an interview might take up to an hour or longer if it’s conducted over the phone or video chat. This allows you to get more people involved without wasting your budget on travel expenses or hiring an assistant who could be doing something else instead (like working on their dissertation). On top of that, many companies offer discounts for using surveys instead of interviews when recruiting new employees; so if you run a small business with just one employee at home and need someone who knows how to use a computer but hates talking on the phone then this option will save money as well!

Conclusion

So when it comes to choosing between questionnaires and interviews, there’s no clear answer. The best way to decide is by considering each method in turn. If you need a quick, cost-effective way to collect data about a small number of people, questionnaires are probably the best choice for you. If you want more flexibility or if your project requires more personalization than a questionnaire can provide, an interview may be better option for you. And if your goal is simply reliability—and not necessarily validity or ethics—then an interview will likely work just fine too!