NURS_6053_Module03_Week04_Discussion
NURS_6053_Module03_Week04_Discussion
Discussion 1: Leadership Theories in Practice
Discussion 1: Leadership Theories in Practice, NURS_6053_WEEK_4_DISCUSSION_INSTRUCTIONS
please follow the instructions below to complete this assignment I will attach the assignment instructions as a file. I will also attach the course required reading and marking rubrics as a file. please use the coursebook as a reference as well
Discussion 1: Leadership Theories in Practice
A walk through the Business section of any bookstore or a quick Internet search on the topic will reveal a seemingly endless supply of writings on leadership. Formal research literature is also teeming with volumes on the subject.
However, your own observation and experiences may suggest these theories are not always so easily found in practice. Not that the potential isn’t there; current evidence suggests that leadership factors such as emotional intelligence and transformational leadership behaviors, for example, can be highly effective for leading nurses and organizations.
Yet, how well are these theories put to practice? In this Discussion, you will examine formal leadership theories. You will compare these theories to behaviors you have observed firsthand and discuss their effectiveness in impacting your organization.
To Prepare:
- Review the Resources and examine the leadership theories and behaviors introduced.
- Identify two to three scholarly resources, in addition to this Module’s readings, that evaluate the impact of leadership behaviors in creating healthy work environments.
- Reflect on the leadership behaviors presented in the three resources that you selected for review.
Post two key insights you had from the scholarly resources you selected. Describe a leader whom you have seen use such behaviors and skills, or a situation where you have seen these behaviors and skills used in practice. Be specific and provide examples. Then, explain to what extent these skills were effective and how their practice impacted the workplace.
Learning Resources
Required Readings
Marshall, E., & Broome, M. (2017). Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert clinician to influential leader (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
- Chapter 1, “Expert Clinician to Transformational Leader in a Complex Health Care Organization: Foundations” (pp. 7–20 ONLY)
- Chapter 6, “Frameworks for Becoming a Transformational Leader” (pp. 145–170)
- Chapter 7, “Becoming a Leader: It’s All About You” (pp. 171–194)
Resources for the StrengthsFinder Assessment Tool
Rath, T. (2007). Strengths Finder 2.0 – with Access Code.
Purchase the access code from the Walden bookstore. Then follow the instructions in the document “How to Access the Strengths Finder 2.0.
Document: How to Access Strengths Finder 2.0 (PDF)
Required Media
Laureate Education (Producer). (2014). Leadership [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Accessible player –Downloads–Download Video w/CCDownload AudioDownload Transcript
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Name: NURS_6053_Module03_Week04_Discussion_Rubric
Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |||
Main Posting | 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
Supported by at least three current, credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.
Supported by at least three credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s).
One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.
Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Post is cited with two credible sources.
Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Contains some APA formatting errors. |
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.
Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Contains only one or no credible sources.
Not written clearly or concisely.
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
||
Main Post: Timeliness | 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3. |
||
First Response | 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
||
Second Response | 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
||
Participation | 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days. |
||
Total Points: 100 | ||||||
Name: NURS_6053_Module03_Week04_Discussion_Rubric
Leadership Theories in Practice
Introduction
Leadership is a broad topic that can be explored on many levels. In this article, we will explore some of the most common leadership theories and their practical applications in the workplace.
Communication
Communication is the key to success. It’s a two-way process, and it’s essential for building trust, team spirit and problem solving.
A leader can’t do it alone–you need your team members to communicate their needs and concerns as well as yours. Communication happens when you ask questions like: “What do we need?” or “What are our goals?” The answer leads directly into actionable steps that will make everyone more successful together!
Conflict Resolution
It’s important to listen to all sides of a conflict. You can do this by asking questions to clarify and focus on the problem, not the person.
For example: “What do you think caused this?” or “What are some possible solutions?” Paraphrasing is another way of giving feedback that helps others feel heard and understood. It’s helpful if you use active listening techniques such as eye contact, nodding your head in agreement with what someone said (or not), using appropriate non-verbal cues like smiling or making noises like sighs when they speak (as opposed to interrupting them), paraphrasing back what someone said so that they know exactly how their words were interpreted by others listening in on their conversation–and so on! A good rule of thumb when communicating via email or text messages is never overshare personal information unless absolutely necessary; otherwise it’ll only serve as fodder for gossiping among coworkers who might be less than thrilled with having had such knowledge thrust upon them!
Group Dynamics
Group dynamics is a field of study that looks at how people interact in groups. It can be used to understand different types of groups, including teams and business organizations. In addition to helping you understand how your team works, group dynamics can also help you develop leadership skills such as building rapport with other people on your team or developing strategies for managing conflict between members.
The key concept behind group dynamics is homogeneity–that is, there are some similarities among all members of a group (or “dyad”). For example, if everyone on your team has worked together before then they will probably share some common traits which make them feel comfortable working together; these similarities include personality types and interests as well as values and attitudes towards work-related issues like productivity levels etcetera). This means that when someone joins this new dyad they may not necessarily feel like they fit in right away because they don’t know any other members yet so it’s important make sure everyone feels welcome by taking time out during meetings or socializing after hours so everyone gets acquainted quickly!
As mentioned earlier there are many ways we could talk about leadership theory but let’s take another look at what happens when someone becomes leader.”
Leadership Development
Leadership development is a complex process that involves many different people, organisations and contexts. This section will introduce you to some key theories of leadership development and discuss how they can be applied to your own situation.
-
Theories of Leadership Development
-
The Role of Leaders in Development
-
The Role of Followers in Development
-
The Role of Organisations in Development
Takeaway:
-
The leadership theory of “dominant” and “submissive” behaviors is outdated.
-
Leaders should be role models and not dictators.
-
Communication is an important aspect of leadership, but it can also be a problem if you don’t know how to manage yourself or others in a way that promotes effective communication.
-
Conflict resolution skills are key for effective leaders, especially when there are multiple conflicting opinions about what needs to happen next in your organization/team/department (or whatever).
-
Group dynamics play an important role in leading–as do interpersonal relationships with co-workers who may not always see eye-to-eye with you on everything! You need them too!
Conclusion
We hope this article has been helpful in providing some ideas on how to use leadership theories in your own organization. We also encourage you to try out one of the above steps, or all of them at once! If you’re looking for more information on how these theories apply to your team, feel free to check out our blog post on “How To Use Leadership Theories In Practice”
Leave a Reply