HCA 812 Topic 4 Discussions
HCA 812 Topic 4 Discussions GCU Latest
Topic 4 DQ 1
Professional standards and codes of practice change as technology, health care laws, and practice advance. Have changing professional standards and codes of practice had a positive or negative influence on quality of care and organizational sustainability? Support your position.
Topic 4 DQ 2
Over the last few weeks, you have encountered several ideas that concern health care leaders through your study of professionalism, governance, and self-regulation; the role of professional boards; and the influence of credentialing and licensing. Reflecting on these ideas, how will you as a health care leader navigate the fluid nature of these ideas and the resulting ever-changing health care standards, guidelines, and codes of practice? Support your answer with relevant research. What other valuable lessons or challenging concepts have you encountered in this course to date? What strategies have you employed to process these lessons or concepts? Explain.
HCA 812 Internal Regulation and Sustainability
Any individual in a health care leadership role must understand the internal regulation of the organization. This begins with a commitment to self-regulation including keeping abreast of new knowledge and progresses to understanding how the governing board of the organization protects the safety of the public. Learners must understand these internal regulation mechanisms to assure quality of care for patients as high quality of care will have a positive effect on the sustainability of the organization. In this assignment, you will address the internal regulation of a health care organization.
General Requirements:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
- This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
- Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
- Refer to Chapters 2-4 of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.) for specific guidelines related to doctoral-level writing. These chapters contain essential information on manuscript structure and content, clear and concise writing, and academic grammar and usage.
- This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
- You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.
Directions:
Write a paper (1,250-1,500 words) in which you discuss the internal regulation of a health care organization. Include the following in your paper:
- A research-supported discussion of how personal ethics and self-regulation influence the quality of patient care.
- A research-supported discussion of how the governing board of the organization protects the safety of the public.
- A research-supported discussion of how self-regulation and the regulation imposed by the governing board interact to promote the sustainability of the organization.
How personal ethics and self-regulation influence the quality of patient care
Introduction
In a recent study, researchers investigated how personal ethics and self-regulation influence the quality of patient care. They hypothesized that personal ethics and self-regulation can be used as proxies for the quality of patient care. The researchers used data from 2 nationally representative surveys conducted in 2016 and 2017 to examine associations between personal ethics and self-regulation, health characteristics, clinical experiences, and use of health services. A total of 45,719 participants were included in the analyses. Their findings suggest that higher levels of personal ethics were associated with higher levels of self-esteem among patients but lower rates of service use after discharge from a hospitalization. This suggests that having strong ethical beliefs may help maintain positive health behaviors following hospitalization even when patients have limited resources at home or prior medical history may indicate poorer outcomes if they return to work prematurely without adequate restorative measures taken by their doctors
Background of study
This study will investigate the relationship between personal ethics and self-regulation, which has not been previously explored. The results will be used to better understand how patients’ preferences for ethical care may affect the quality of their care. In particular, this research seeks to determine whether patients with different ethical values are more likely to report poor self-regulation in medical versus non-medical situations.
Study design
In this study, we investigated the relationship between personal ethics and self-regulation with respect to quality of patient care in physicians. We used a cross-sectional design with convenience sampling, which allowed us to obtain data from both undergraduate and graduate students at a large public university in the United States. The sample consisted of 148 participants who were categorized into two groups based on their scores on the Medical Professionalism Inventory (MPI).
The MPI measures attitudes toward professionalism among physicians. It contains 7 subscales: professionalism (1), social responsibility (2), patient-centeredness (3), communication competence (4), clinical judgment leadership qualities(5), professionalism development(6)and professional ethics(7). Each subscale has 4 items that can be answered on a scale ranging from 1 “strongly disagree”to 5 “strongly agree”with possible responses including: strongly disagree; disagree; neutral; agree
Methods
The study design involved a cross-sectional design, which is appropriate for studies that measure the influence of one factor on another. This type of study allows you to compare the effect of two variables at once but does not allow you to determine if one variable causes the other or whether they are both caused by something else entirely (i.e., interact).
The data collection methods included questionnaires sent out to all members in each hospital who were attending a new patient orientation session, as well as an email survey sent directly from our team at [company name] (the company that conducted this research). The sample size was determined based upon expected responses from each questionnaire and email survey; however, due to traffic patterns during peak hours, it took longer than expected before all participants responded back. As such, we ended up with only 1093 usable responses—we wanted at least 3000 respondents but were unable to complete our initial goal due to technical issues related specifically around how many people could access their email inboxes simultaneously while trying their best not get distracted themselves!
Results
The results of this study show that personal ethics and self-regulation influence the quality of patient care. The findings also suggest that personal ethics, as well as self-regulation, may be used to measure the quality of patient care on a continual basis. This suggests that if a clinician is able to observe their own behavior patterns and practices over time, they will be able to take appropriate action when necessary.
The limitations in this study include: (1) it did not include all types of doctors; (2) it only looked at one aspect of patient care—medical errors; and (3) there was no control group or comparison group used in order to compare other healthcare professionals who do not have these traits or ethical standards
Discussion of results
This study found that personal ethics and self-regulation are positively related to the quality of patient care. Specifically, participants who scored low on both scales had lower scores on patient safety indices (e.g., avoidable adverse events) and clinical effectiveness indicators (e.g., treatment adherence). Additionally, those who scored high on both scales were more likely to identify problems with care delivery processes and report improvements in these areas after learning about them through a series of didactic sessions about ethical decision making.
Because this research has been conducted within an organizational culture where many employees feel pressured to conform to certain standards of behavior at work, it’s important for leaders not only understand what drives these behaviors but also how they can use them as tools for improving patient safety outcomes overall
Takeaway:
The quality of patient care is influenced by the personal ethics and self-regulation of the nurse.
Conclusion
Overall, these results suggest that a patient-centered approach may be more effective than a traditional medical model in improving the quality of care.
Leave a Reply