HLT 520 Week 5 Discussions Paper

HLT 520 Week 5 Discussions Paper

 

HLT 520 Week 5 Discussion 1 Latest-GCU

You are a hospital administrator, and you receive a call from a colleague at another hospital. Your colleague, who is a friend, informs you that he has received a demand for a stipend from the ophthalmologists who take ED calls at his hospital, and they want a sizeable raise. He asks you what you pay for that type of call, and suggests that you could both benefit by coming up with a standard rate of pay over which neither of you will go in response to physician demands. It could save your hospitals $300,000 to do this. What is your response, and what is the rationale for it?

HLT 520 Week 5 Discussion 2 Latest-GCU

Do you think that hospitals who engage in group purchasing organizations are engaging in a form of price-fixing? If yes, then why? If no, then why not?

 

GCU HLT 520 Week 5 Assignment

Details:

1) Read the case study (“Contract Violates Antitrust Laws”) on pages 100-101 in the textbook and answer the two discussion questions.

2) Write a paper (1,000-1,500 words) that addresses the discussion questions. Include a detailed rationale for your answers.

3) Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

4) This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

Law Suit Recommendation Paper

Details:

Scenario: A physician is claiming injury and damages from a hospital that notified him they were not renewing his contract for services provided. The hospital gave him a 4-month notice and stated that they were exercising this right because they wanted the department in which the physician functioned “to go in a new direction.” The physician has filed notice of intention to sue.

1) As the hospital administrator, write a paper (750-1,000-words) that explores the options for defending the suit in court, going to arbitration, going to mediation, or structuring a settlement. Include the pros and cons of each option and end with a recommendation to your board of directors on which avenue to pursue.

2) Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

3) This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment

 

ADDITIONAL INFO 

Group purchasing organizations

Introduction

The healthcare industry is largely focused on the patient. However, there are many other players involved in making decisions about how best to serve patients. One of these groups is called a Group Purchasing Organization (GPO). A GPO is simply an organization that purchases large numbers of items from multiple vendors at once so that it can get better pricing and save money.

GPO benefits to members

The benefits to members of a GPO include:

• The buying power of the group. This can be used to negotiate better prices and get discounts from suppliers.

• The ability to share resources, such as storage facilities and transportation services, with other groups in your GPO network.

The emergence of hospital-owned GPOs in the US

GPOs are a way to share resources, get better deals and service and product. They can also be used as tools for negotiating price discounts on products or services. The key is that they help you gain access to these benefits by pooling your money with other patients in your area who have similar health care needs.

In some cases, hospital-owned GPOs are a more efficient way for hospitals to provide care because they don’t have to pay for overhead costs associated with private practices — such as rent and salaries — which can account for up to 20% of overall expenses at many hospitals (1).

GPO criticism and controversy

• GPO criticism and controversy

GPOs have been criticized for being too big and too powerful. Some people argue that they are too large to be effective, while others say they need to be more efficient if they want to succeed. It’s also been said that GPO leaders need to take a more hands-on approach if they want their organizations’ goals met in the best way possible.

All sorts of entities are involved in healthcare purchasing and decisions.

GPOs are not insurance companies. They’re not hospitals, health plans or government agencies. They’re not employers or unions either. But they do provide health care purchasing services to a wide range of organizations—including small businesses and large corporations alike—and their work can significantly improve your bottom line by providing you with access to better deals on medical equipment, technology and supplies than you would otherwise find without them in the marketplace.

What makes GPOs different from other healthcare providers? The answer lies in how they operate: rather than selling directly to consumers (like an insurer), GPO’s focus on helping clients reduce costs through bulk purchasing allows them to negotiate lower prices on behalf of their clients’ members/patients/clients’ employees who may be unable or unwilling to shop around for better deals themselves.*

Conclusion

All in all, a good GPO is one that uses data to make decisions, is transparent about its processes and interests, and can work with a variety of stakeholders. The best way to think about them is as an extension of your organization—but one that’s willing to listen to input from many different directions.