1. Does your peer meet the clear and professional communication standards set for this project? What specific choices show that they meet this objective? What is one change that could make it even stronger?
  2. Does your peer show awareness of their audience by anticipating how the recipient might respond? Explain your reasoning with an example.
  3. Rate the neatness of your peer's email or letter on a scale of 1-3. Kindly explain your rating.
  4. Are their complaints or requests framed in a way that encourages action? Explain your reasoning with an example.
  5. Does your peer go beyond the basic scenario, or do they only repeat exactly what was provided? Give examples of where they added extra detail, thought, or professionalism. If not, suggest two ways they could have shown more creativity.
  6. Does your peer follow the email or letter format outlined in the instructions? Give examples of how they do or do not. Offer your peer encouraging words in either case.
  7. Do you notice any signs your peer may have used AI in their work? If so, how effectively did they use it? Do you feel that they used it as a support tool or as a replacement for their own writing? Explain your reasoning. Offer tips for how they could use AI effectively (e.g., to catch proofreading or grammar errors) or more responsibly.

Skip to main content Site Logo Log in 0

Notifications

You have no notifications See all 2 There are 2 unread conversations Trahnae Stjulien Profile   Grades Calendar Private files Reports   Preferences   Log out Access hidden sidebar block region. Menu


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *