NUR 504 WEEK 8 COMPLETE DISCUSSION NUR 504 WEEK 8 COMPLETE DISCUSSION NUR504 NUR 504 Week 8 Discussions 1 Post your groups CLC EBP project. Critically read two CLC EBP projects (other than your own). Name one barrier for each that could impact the implementation of the guideline in practice and how you would work through this issue. NUR 504 Week 8 Discussions 2 Discuss what is meant by mixed-methods designs. What are the limitations of these designs. CLICK HERE TO ORDER YOUR NUR 504 WEEK 8 COMPLETE DISCUSSION NUR 504 Week 8 Critique of Research Studies Part 3 Latest Follow the instructions provided in Critique of Research Studies instructions. When turning in the final submission, please put in the following order: Quantitative Article Critique, Qualitative Article Critique, References (should include the two articles, the text, and any other additional sources). Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. NUR 504 Week 8 Critique of Research Studies Part 3 Latest Follow the instructions provided in Critique of Research Studies instructions. When turning in the final submission, please put in the following order: Quantitative Article Critique, Qualitative Article Critique, References (should include the two articles, the text, and any other additional sources). Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment. You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin, unless otherwise directed by your instructor. If so directed, refer to the Student Success Center for directions. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin. Critique of Research Studies Instructions Directions: Complete a critique of the quantitative and qualitative articles that were submitted in Topic 3. This assignment will be completed in three parts. Refer to the information below as a guide to the information that should be included in each part. Follow the guidelines for the quantitative and qualitative article critiques in Chapter 5, Box 5.2, pages 112-114 and Box 5.3, pages 115-117 of the textbook or the Research Critique Additional Template Resource. 1) Utilize a central heading to indicate that what follows is the critique of the articles. 2) The side headings of the critique for each article should follow the headings in Box 5.2 and 5.3. 3) Note that within these BASIC guidelines, there are additional references to Detailed Critiquing Guidelines found in various boxes in chapters focused on the various elements of a research study report. Use these to expand the research study and to learn specific terminology appropriate to the critique of research. When turning in the final submission, please put in thefollowing order: Quantitative Article Critique, Qualitative Article Critique, References (should include the two articles, the text, and any other additional sources). Critique of Research Studies ? Part 1: Due Topic 4 For Part 1 of the critique, focus only on the following segments for each article: Quantitative?????? Qualitative Title??? ? Title Abstract?????????? ? Abstract Introduction?? ? Introduction o Statement of the problem?????? o Statement of the problem o Hypotheses or research questions?????? o Research questions o Literature review???????? o Literature review o Conceptual/theoretical framework????? o Conceptual underpinnings Critique of Research Studies ? Part 2: Due Topic 6 For Part 2 of the critique, focus only on the following segments for each article: Quantitative?????? Qualitative Method??????????? ? Method o Protection of human rights????? o Protection of participants rights o Research design?????????? o Research design and research tradition o Population and sample????????????? o Sample and setting o Data collection and measurement??????? o Data collection o Procedures???? o Procedures o Enhancement of trustworthiness Critique of Research Studies ? Part 3: Due Topic 8 For Part 3 of the critique, focus only on the following segments for each article: Quantitative?????? Qualitative Results????????????? ? Results o Data analysis? o Data analysis o Findings o Reliability and Validity o Findings Discussion?????? o Theoretical integrations o Interpretation of findings???????? ? Discussion o Implications/recommendations???????????? o Interpretation of the findings Global Issues? o Implications/recommendations o Presentation? ? Global Issues o Researcher credibility o Presentation o Summary assessment??????????????? o Researcher credibility o Summary assessment 

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION;

Introduction

Mixed methods designs are a method for combining different research techniques, such as quantitative and qualitative research, within an overall study. A mixed-methods study uses both quantitative and qualitative data to provide a more comprehensive evidence base than either method in isolation. The strength of mixed methods lies in their ability to give researchers access to information not available through either approach by itself.

What are mixed-methods designs?

Mixed methods designs are a combination of qualitative and quantitative research. Qualitative research focuses on understanding the meaning of people’s experiences, while quantitative research focuses on understanding the frequency, magnitude and distribution of those experiences. Mixed methods designs allow researchers to understand complex phenomena by combining both methods for data collection within a single study or project.

Introduction

Mixed-methods designs, also known as mixed methods research, are used when we have a combination of quantitative and qualitative data. This allows us to get an accurate picture of our data by using both types of evidence. In this section, you’ll learn about why mixed-methods studies are important and how they can be used in the social sciences.

Examples of mixed-methods research designs

Mixed-methods designs are a relatively new phenomenon in social science research. In this article, we’ll explore different types of mixed methods designs and how they can be used to address different research questions.

• Case study: You want to understand how people interact with an object or service by observing them using it firsthand. This type of design has many strengths—it’s easy for researchers to obtain access, it allows them to observe behavior in its natural setting (i.e., at home), and it provides powerful insights into what makes us human (i.e., our tendency toward empathy). However, case studies are limited by the fact that they only allow researchers access once; this means they don’t necessarily represent how most people behave over time or across cultures/geographies/etc.. In addition, because case studies involve only one person at a time (or small groups), they may not provide accurate representations of larger populations’ behaviors due simply on size alone – especially when trying compare behavior across multiple variables such as age groups or socioeconomic status levels).

Sample sizes for mixed-methods designs

Before you start planning your next study, it’s important to understand how many people are needed in each group. The sample size required depends on the goal that your study will achieve and the level of confidence desired by the researcher.

• If you want to detect a difference between two groups with 90% power, then you need about 100 participants per group (or 690 participants altogether).

• If you have 80% power and want to detect a difference between two groups with 95% confidence, then approximately 130 participants per group is recommended.

Mixed-methods designs and the baseline survey

The baseline survey is a quantitative study. It can be used to inform the qualitative study and/or the quantitative study.

The baseline survey may also be used as an independent variable in your experiment, so you can test whether or not people who answered one question differently are more likely to answer another question differently.

For example: You’re interested in finding out what factors influence people’s decision about whether or not they will buy your product (i.e., you want to know if price is a factor). You run a focus group where everyone agrees on what price range would meet their needs; then you ask them which is most important when making this decision—pricing or quality? Afterward, all participants are asked again but this time only those who stated that pricing was their top priority were asked about quality instead of both being lumped together into one category called “price.” This way we’ll see if there really is any relationship between people’s values regarding these two aspects!

Mixed-methods research design and intervention evaluation

• Mixed-methods research design and intervention evaluation

Mixed methods can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention. For example, you may want to compare two different interventions (e.g., one group received standard treatment and another group received experimental therapy). In this case, you would use a randomized control trial (RCT) design—one where participants are randomly assigned into one treatment condition or another based on randomization criteria such as computer generated numbers—to measure change in outcomes from the treatment over time. You will also need to collect data from participants using observational methods such as interviews or questionnaires before they begin their treatments so that you can see how much influence each type of intervention has on their recovery process after being injured. You could then compare these results with those obtained from RCTs when comparing groups who received either type of therapy under similar conditions but with different characteristics related specifically towards injury recovery processes such as age distribution etcetera…

Using mixed methods to explore processes of intervention implementation

Mixed methods designs can be used to study the implementation, impact and evaluation of an intervention.

• The implementation process is defined as the steps that individuals take to implement a program or policy (as in a randomized trial).

• The impact process refers to how effective an intervention is by measuring changes in outcomes among participants before and after they were exposed to it (as in a quasi-experimental design).

• Finally, there are two ways we can look at whether our programs or policies are working: firstly by looking at what’s been done so far (or whether someone has tried something), then secondly by seeing if those things have had any effect on people’s lives – this is called evaluating their success/failure rate

Using mixed methods to explore processes of intervention impact

Mixed methods have been used to explore processes of intervention impact, implementation and evaluation.

Mixing methods can be used to explore the effectiveness of an intervention in various ways. For example:

• A qualitative study might examine the experiences of those who have received a particular service or treatment, while a quantitative study may focus on how many people have received that service or treatment (in order to compare them against one another). These two approaches are often combined when there is no clear answer as to whether what was being studied was effective or not—for example if you’re trying out something new for your organization but aren’t sure if it’s going over well with employees yet? You could do both types at once! Or maybe you want feedback from everyone who works within your company so they know exactly where improvements need made before moving forward with expansion plans? In this case using multiple research methods would help us understand both sides’ opinions about how things were going so far without bias creeping into our results due largely because all involved parties were aware of what we were doing beforehand which gave them enough time prepare themselves mentally before meeting up again later down line.”

Summary

Mixed methods designs are a powerful tool for understanding complex issues, such as the implementation of interventions. They can also be used to explore the impact of interventions on individuals and organizations.

Mixed methods research is an approach in which strategies from different research methods are used together (e.g., quantitative and qualitative). An example would be combining quantitative data with interviews with people who have experienced an intervention or trying out a new method like participatory action research (PAR).

Mixed methods allow the strength of qualitative and quantitative approaches to be combined, giving an evidence base that is much more comprehensive than one method in isolation.

Mixed methods allow the strength of qualitative and quantitative approaches to be combined, giving an evidence base that is much more comprehensive than one method in isolation.

Mixed methods are particularly useful when you want to explore processes of intervention implementation or impact. They allow researchers to use both quantitative data (e.g., surveys) and qualitative data (e.g., interviews, focus groups).

Conclusion

This is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to what mixed methods can do. They offer a great way for researchers to create a more comprehensive evidence base for their research, as well as explore processes at a deeper level. What’s more, they are becoming increasingly popular in general because they allow us all to engage with our research from multiple perspectives and build on each other’s work rather than only relying on our own findings.