NUR 699 Week 6 Assignment – Evidence-Based Practice Proposal: Section G: Evaluation of Process

Evidence-Based Practice Proposal: Section G: Evaluation of Process

NUR 699 Week 6 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice Proposal: Section G: Evaluation of Process

Details:

In 500-750 words (not including the title page and reference page), develop an evaluation plan to be included in your final evidence-based practice project. Provide the following criteria in the evaluation, making sure it is comprehensive and concise:

1. Describe the rationale for the methods used in collecting the outcome data.
2. Describe the ways in which the outcome measures evaluate the extent to which the project objectives are achieved.
3. Describe how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the evidence. Address validity, reliability, and applicability.
4. Describe strategies to take if outcomes do not provide positive results.
5. Describe implications for practice and future research.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Upon receiving feedback from the instructor, refine “Section G: Evaluation” for your final submission. This will be a continuous process throughout the course for each section.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Upon receiving feedback from the instructor, refine “Section G: Evaluation” for your final submission. This will be a continuous process throughout the course for each section.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION;

Describe the rationale for the methods used in collecting the outcome data

Introduction

This study was a prospective, longitudinal cohort study conducted over 6 months. The aim was to evaluate the impact of BCG vaccination on oral health outcomes among children aged 9-12 years in a low income setting.

Outcome measures were selected on the basis of the study objectives and the relevance of previous research.

Outcome measures were selected on the basis of the study objectives and the relevance of previous research. The outcomes selected were designed to measure effectiveness of a new intervention in improving nutritional status, physical activity levels or quality of life.

The study was designed to test the effectiveness of a new intervention that may improve nutritional status, physical activity levels or quality of life in an at-risk population. The primary outcome measures were selected on the basis of the study objectives and the relevance of previous research.

The study was designed to test the effectiveness of a new intervention that may improve nutritional status, physical activity levels or quality of life in an at-risk population. The primary outcome measures were selected on the basis of the study objectives and the relevance of previous research.

Data were collected at baseline, 3 months and 6 months post-enrolment.

Data were collected at baseline, 3 months and 6 months post-enrolment. Data collection was conducted by trained personnel who were blinded to group allocation throughout the trial. The data were analysed using SPSS v21 software (version 21). They were then stored separately in secure electronic files on password-protected computers at each study site.

The ethical considerations for this trial included the following:

• All participants provided written informed consent before enrolment; no participant entered into the study without consenting to it (except those who opted not to take part). This was done because we wanted our participants’ views on their experiences with our program as well as any potential side effects associated with it;

• All participants gave verbal consent during interview sessions that lasted about 30 minutes each;

• We asked them about their experiences with our program and any potential side effects caused by taking part in it; –

Participants were not paid for participation in the study.

The data was collected by self-report, meaning that participants were asked to complete a questionnaire at each time point. This method is known as self-report because it involves the participant answering questions about themselves. In this case, participants were asked to complete a questionnaire at each time point and they could choose whether or not they wanted their answers kept confidential (i.e., not shared with others).

The questionnaires were divided into different sections so that it would be easier for researchers to find specific information about how people felt about certain things such as sexual health and relationships in general.

Another limitation is that the data was collected by self-report, meaning that participants were asked to complete a questionnaire at each time point. This method is known as self-report because it involves the participant answering questions about themselves. In this case, participants were asked to complete a questionnaire at each time point and they could choose whether or not they wanted their answers kept confidential

This was a prospective, longitudinal cohort study conducted over 6 months

The rationale for collecting outcome data was to determine whether the patient’s condition improved after treatment. Research on this topic has shown that, for some conditions, patients do not improve and there is no clear benefit from treatment. The method used in collecting the outcome data was prospective cohort study with a follow-up interval of 6 months. This methodology allowed us to compare two groups at different stages of their disease process: patients who did not receive any treatment (control) vs those who received treatment (treated).

The results of the study showed that there were no significant differences between the two groups.

The results of this study indicate that treatment has no effect on the disease process. However, it should be noted that this was not a randomized control trial (RCT). The participants were selected based on their willingness to participate in the study, which may have introduced selection bias.

Conclusion

This study used a prospective, longitudinal cohort design along with the use of an extended follow-up period. The outcome measures collected were selected on the basis of the study objectives and previous research. Data were collected at baseline, 3 months and 6 months post-enrolment. Participants were not paid for participation in this study.