?Democracies change their policies almost entirely through incremental adjustment. Policy does not move in leaps and bounds? thereby ensuring the stability of government (Miyakawa, 1999, p. 298). In light of this classic quote, what incremental gains have been made by passage and implementation of the ACA, and what additional reforms will be necessary to move further toward health care access for all? Reference: Miyakawa, T. (1999). The science of public policy: Essential readings in policy sciences I. New York: Taylor & Francis. Discussion 2 (250-300 words, 2-3 credible references in APA) Keeping in mind the case of the home health agency that we have discussed since Module 1. As Saras supervisor, how would you approach her case to ensure timely solution is implemented in regards to the concern of disease outbreak? What are the limitations of your approach? Module 1 Case Your supervisor told you that she recently received a call from an advocate whom an employee consulted via the Employee Assistance Program because the employee felt that she had been treated unfairly after contracting an illness. She explained that a few months ago, one of your agencys home health aides, Sara, became ill. Sara had been coughing for approximately six weeks, lost weight without trying, had no appetite, was having difficulty sleeping, and had an intermittent fever. She became concerned and went to see a healthcare professional who diagnosed her with active tuberculosis (TB). Sara missed a lot of time from work while completing treatment for TB. Her physician cleared her to return to work after she was no longer contagious. Upon returning to work, Sara felt isolated because her boss and co-workers refused to spend time with her. She heard that someone from the agencys Human Resources Department told her co-workers her diagnosis. The stressful circumstances at work became even worse when another home health aide started to display the same symptoms Sara had. Your supervisor has asked you to review the entire situation and how it was handled by the agency. Each module includes information about epidemiology, health statistics, public health, health communication and advocacy, health literacy, healthcare delivery systems, the Affordable Care Act, ethical considerations, human resources management, legal aspects, cultural and global perspectives, and financial considerations for the organization. Your methodology over the next few weeks will be to arrange interviews with the relevant individuals, departments, and agencies, in addition to researching professional and scholarly sources, educational videos, and news articles. You will evaluate the information you gather throughout the course of your investigation in order to determine the best course of action. Ultimately, the information will be used to formulate policies and create an employee education presentation. Democracies change their policies almost entirely through incremental adjustment. Order Now

 

ADDITIONAL DETAILS 

Democracies change their policies almost entirely through incremental adjustment

Introduction

The old adage that democracies change their policies through revolutions is true, but not in the way you might think. A revolution is a very violent and dangerous event which can result in a lot of bloodshed. Even if an idea seems good at first, it isn’t necessarily going to work well with many people involved in making it happen. Instead, democracies make changes incrementally by testing them out on smaller groups first before rolling them out nationwide.

The “normal” method of changing democracy is moving in tiny steps.

The “normal” method of changing democracy is moving in tiny steps.

Democracy is a process, not an event. A country may be democratic at the time you visit it and authoritarian the next day, or vice versa depending on political circumstance and what’s happening around them. Democracy doesn’t exist in one place at once—it exists wherever people are willing to participate in making decisions about their lives together with others who share similar interests and values.*

Democracy is not simply elections; it’s also how we make decisions together as a society and act on them effectively through electoral processes (elections). Democracies change their policies almost entirely through incremental adjustment: minor adjustments here and there over time until they reach something like consensus among all members of society who care about those issues enough to participate in public discussion about them

Nearly every advance that we call a revolution is only the last small push after many years of adjusting in the same direction.

You may be wondering why I’ve chosen to write about democratic revolutions. Aren’t they a bad thing? Isn’t it better to just let things change gradually, over time?

The answer is yes, but only if you understand what a revolution actually means. For example, when people say that the French Revolution was “revolutionary,” they usually mean something different than what most Americans think of when they hear the word. When we say “revolution” in America today, we usually mean an abrupt change in political power (e.g., from one party to another). This can be very bloody—think of all those people who died during the Civil War! But there are other ways for democracies to change their policies without making sudden changes in power: incremental adjustment toward new goals through small steps taken over many years or decades—or even centuries—of steady progress toward those same goals.* In other words: gradualism is not just better than suddenness; it’s often necessary too.*

The point here is that nearly every advance that we call a revolution is only the last small push after many years of adjusting in the same direction.*

The American Revolution was a very long time in the making, through many small changes and incremental adjustments.

The American Revolution was a long time in the making, through many small changes and incremental adjustments.

In 1765, Britain’s Stamp Act was passed by Parliament to tax colonists based on their use of paper currency. This caused great anger among Americans who believed that this new tax would make them more dependent on London and thus put them at a disadvantage compared to their English counterparts. When the Stamp Act became law in 1767, it sparked protests across America with some people even burning down effigies of George III (the king) as well as his effigy being burned down at St Paul’s Cathedral in London itself!

The French Revolution did come out of nowhere, but even then there were advances before the revolution.

The French Revolution did come out of nowhere, but even then there were advances before the revolution. In 1789, Louis XVI of France decided to impose a new tax on those who made more than 300 livres per year (about $250 USD). This was meant to help reduce poverty and support public works projects like bridges and roads. However, it was poorly implemented and led to protests from those who feared being taxed at all—and eventually resulted in Napoleon’s coup d’état that established his dictatorship over France for about 15 years until his defeat by Prussia in 1815.

Since then, the French have restored order not with another revolution, but by more incremental change.

Since then, the French have restored order not with another revolution, but by more incremental change. They have reduced poverty and unemployment through social programs like education and health care. They’ve expanded access to higher education, especially at public universities that were closed during World War II because they were seen as centers of intellectualism and separatism. They’ve created a universal healthcare system that covers everyone in France—even those who make too much money to qualify for Medicare in America or Medicaid here in Oregon!

The French have also made significant efforts toward gender equality (more women than men get degrees) while also maintaining high levels of social mobility; this means that if you live in France today your kids will probably do better than you did when you were growing up there were still jobs available for young people without college degrees so long as they could find work quickly enough before starting families themselves later on down the line.”

Even major policies like Obamacare came first as ideas that were tested in smaller forms.

Even major policies like Obamacare came first as ideas that were tested in smaller forms. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) was developed over many years, and was not a single piece of legislation; it was originally called “The Health Care Freedom Reconciliation Act,” which became the HCR bill when it passed through Congress. It also had other names throughout its development: “The Health Equity and Access Reform Today” (HEART); “The Patient Protection and Affordability Act of 2003”; “Hospital Stabilization Program”; “Patient Protection Amendments to Prevent Hospital Beds from Becoming Empty”.

This long-range planning meant that many aspects of this law were tested out before it was implemented fully. The ACA gave states flexibility when developing their own health care programs—which meant some states could opt out entirely from implementing any part of Obamacare, while others would see significant changes in their health care systems based on tweaks made by Washington D C .

This is good because revolutions can be very bloody and dangerous.

This is good because revolutions can be very bloody and dangerous.

The French Revolution was a case of incremental change, as opposed to the American Revolution, which was not so much a case of incremental change but rather an example of how democracies can change their policies entirely through small adjustments over time.

Incremental change is good for democracy because it involves many people who look at the problems with different viewpoints.

In a democracy, incremental change is good because it involves many people who look at the problems with different viewpoints. This allows for testing of ideas and gradual improvements to be made.

For example: if you want your nation’s health care system to be more efficient, you can implement small changes over time until you have something that works well for everyone. If these changes are popular enough among citizens, then there may not need to be any large-scale overhauls in order to make things better overall—it could just be done incrementally!

Conclusion

If you think that democracies and revolutions are opposites, then you’ve been looking at them the wrong way. Both depend on incremental change to get from one place to another, but it’s easier to see when there’s a huge leap in policy. We think of revolutions as being abrupt and dramatic changes, but they really aren’t; they only look that way because we don’t have any experience with other forms of government before them! Democracies are more familiar to us because we have lived under them for so long (we hope), but there is still much work left to do before democracy becomes perfect.”