NUR 504 WEEK 4 COMPLETE DISCUSSION NUR 504 WEEK 4 COMPLETE DISCUSSION NUR504 NUR 504 Week 4 Discussions 1 Read the section Questionnaires versus Interviews on pages 305-306 in the textbook. How are these guidelines similar and different from data collected by nurses when giving care? What principles did you identify that are new to you but could be important in improving your collection of clinical data? NUR 504 Week 4 Discussions 2 You are interested in nurses attitudes toward EBP. Which method do you think would work best to obtain this information: a questionnaire, a face-to-face interview, or a group interview? Defend your answer. CLICK HERE TO ORDER YOUR NUR 504 WEEK 4 COMPLETE DISCUSSION NUR 504 Week 4 CLC EBP Identification Latest NUR504 Week 4 Collaborative Learning Community: EBP Identification Latest This is a CLC assignment. Follow the instructions provided in ?CLC Assignment: Evidence-Based Project (EBP).? Utilize the Synthesis Table, Table of Evidence and EBA Project Evaluation Tool to complete your CLC assignment. Submit these documents in Topic 5 as the CLC assignment. APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected. NUR 504 Week 4 Critique of Research Studies ? Part 1 Latest Follow the instructions provided in Critique of Research Studies Instructions. Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. NUR 504 Critique of Research Studies ? Part 1 Latest Follow the instructions provided in Critique of Research Studies Instructions. Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment. You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin, unless otherwise directed by your instructor. If so directed, refer to the Student Success Center for directions. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin. Critique of Research Studies Instructions Directions: Complete a critique of the quantitative and qualitative articles that were submitted in Module 3. This assignment will be completed in three parts. Refer to the information below as a guide to the information that should be included in each part. Follow the guidelines for the quantitative and qualitative article critiques in Chapter 5, Box 5.2, pages 112-114 and Box 5.3, pages 115-117 of the textbook. 1) Utilize a central heading to indicate that what follows is the critique of the articles. 2) The side headings of the critique for each article should follow the headings in Box 5.2 and 5.3. 3) Note that within these BASIC guidelines, there are additional references to Detailed Critiquing Guidelines found in various boxes in chapters focused on the various elements of a research study report. Use these to expand the research study and to learn specific terminology appropriate to the critique of research. When turning in the final submission, please put in the the following order: Quantitative Article Critique, Qualitative Article Critique, References (should include the two articles, the text, and any other additional sources). Critique of Research Studies ? Part 1: Due Module 4 For Part 1 of the critique, focus only on the following segments for each article: Quantitative?????? Qualitative Title??? ? Title Abstract?????????? ? Abstract Introduction?? ? Introduction o Statement of the problem?????? o Statement of the problem o Hypotheses or research questions?????? o Research questions o Literature review???????? o Literature review o Conceptual/theoretical framework????? o Conceptual underpinnings 

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION;

Introduction

You’re planning a research project and need to find out more about your target audience. You’ve decided to use questionnaires, but you’re not sure which ones are right for your needs. Or maybe you want to interview people in-person for some qualitative data, but haven’t been able to find any suitable candidates for the job. This can be tricky! In this post, we’ll compare questionnaires and interviews so that you can make a decision on which type of survey would work best for your needs. To get started, let’s take an overview look at each type of questionnaire or interview:

Questionnaires and interviews are both popular types of survey, but they each have their own advantages and disadvantages.

A questionnaire is a tool that allows you to gather information from your target audience. The goal of questionnaires is to collect data on a particular topic, while the interview focuses on collecting more general information about the respondent’s experience with your product or service.

Both types of surveys are useful in gathering data; however, they each have their own advantages and disadvantages:

• Questionnaires are more efficient because they don’t require you to travel as far as an interview does you can simply send out an email with questions attached at any time during their working day (or week). You also don’t need any special equipment for conducting a questionnaire; all you need is paper and pen! This makes them cheaper than interviews because there aren’t many expenses associated with sending out surveys over long distances via mail delivery services like FedEx or UPS). However, if there are lots of people responding back then this method could become expensive quite quickly depending on how many responses per person came back before running out completely so make sure not just anybody gets sent one but only those who really want answers from someone else besides themselves.”

Interviews are especially likely to provide qualitative data, while questionnaires are more apt to provide quantitative data.

The type of data you’re looking for will determine what method is best for you. Questionnaires are more likely to provide quantitative information and interviews are more apt to gather qualitative data. In some cases, however, interviews may be better than questionnaires. For example:

• If a company wants to hire you because of your skills as a programmer, but also because of something else about your personality or experience (like how much fun it would be working with other people), then an interview would probably be useful in finding out whether this is something that interests them. But if they want someone who can work independently and won’t cause trouble when deadlines get tight and there aren’t many companies out there that need either one then asking questions on paper might be enough information

Questionnaires allow respondents more time to think.

Questionnaires allow respondents more time to think and answer the questions in a way that is most meaningful to them.

• Respondents can take time to think about the questions, instead of answering them immediately. This will help them provide an accurate description of their own experiences, attitudes and beliefs.

• If a respondent does not understand a question or has difficulty answering it, they may ask for clarification so that they can provide an accurate description of their own experiences, attitudes and beliefs.

Asking questions in person can capture a lot of nonverbal information, which can be helpful.

Asking questions in person can capture a lot of nonverbal information, which can be helpful. For example, you can observe body language and facial expressions to determine whether the candidate is paying attention or distracted. You also get an opportunity to see how people react to each other, which may give you some insight into their personality traits. Finally, asking follow-up questions based on nonverbal cues allows candidates to demonstrate confidence and competence without being prompted by an interviewer or manager who may not understand what they’re doing well enough yet.

Interviews are more expensive than questionnaires and require more skills from the researcher.

Interviews are more expensive than questionnaires and require more skills from the researcher. An interview is an in-depth conversation with one or more people (a group of people). The purpose of an interview is to get information on a topic, but it can also be used for market research purposes as well.

Questionnaires are cheaper than interviews because they do not require any additional costs like travel or equipment hire; however, there may still be some additional costs involved if you want them printed out or photocopied at your local library or printing company.

Interviewing is less efficient than sending out questionnaires by mail.

Interviewing is less efficient than sending out questionnaires by mail. It can take a lot of time to conduct interviews, and it’s often difficult to get a representative sample. In addition, if you’re using an online interviewer tool like SurveyMonkey or Qualtrics, you’ll have to pay per-interview fee (which can be expensive).

If you don’t want to spend money on interviewing and don’t have access to any other way of reaching people without having them come into your office in person like via email or phone calls then consider asking them directly via social media platforms such as Facebook Messenger or WhatsApp messages instead.

Both questionnaires and interviews can be useful for gathering information for use in research.

Both questionnaires and interviews can be useful for gathering information for use in research. Each methods has its advantages and disadvantages, which I will describe below.

Both methods are used to gather quantitative or qualitative data. Quantitative research involves collecting data through observation and measurement, while qualitative studies involve the collection of stories or other forms of expression that represent some aspect of reality (Alvesson et al., 2003). When using a questionnaire as part of your research project you should ensure that your questions are neutral so that respondents feel comfortable answering them without fear of being judged or criticised by others who may see your study as biased towards one particular group within society (e.g., males). Interviews on the other hand allow people to express themselves freely without worrying about whether they might be wrong or misunderstood their answers later down the line when writing up final reports on findings from interviews conducted during this phase…

Conclusion

Both questionnaires and interviews can be useful for gathering information for use in research. Questionnaires are more likely to provide quantitative data, while interviews are more apt to provide qualitative data. Asking questions in person allows respondents to think and gives researchers access to nonverbal information that may not be captured on paper through a questionnaire. In addition, interviewer bias is less likely with an interview because it requires less time from the researcher and allows them to focus more on what they want answers from the respondent.