Assignment instructions:

 

Overview: Using the topic and research question you developed in week 1, you will design a qualitative instrument that could potentially answer your topic/research question if it were to be applied to a qualitative study. Keep in mind, this may take some stretching if you wrote your question leaning quantitatively. The purpose here is not to box you in but to ensure that you have a solid understanding of both methodologies.

Directions:

You will develop a word document to include:

  1. View the rubric to make sure you understand the expectations of this assignment
  2. Your research question in the form of a qualitative question (if it was not already).
  3. An instrument or protocol (interview, ethnography, focus group protocol, etc) that could be used to answer the qualitative version of your research question.
  4. A one-paragraph description/justification of how your chosen instrument/protocol is the best choice for answering the qualitative version of your research question. This should include citations from the literature to support justification.

DSRT 837 Rubric (Adapted from Doctoral Research Handbook)

Criterion

4 (Expert)

3 (Proficient)

2 (Fair)

1 (Poor)

I. Critical and reflective thinking capable of facilitating institutional, informational technology, or business related problem-solving or school/ college improvement

Critically analyzed the topic. Discussion of the topic was extensive and anchored in fact and reason. Information about significant aspects of the topic were analyzed from the perspective of key related concepts. Meaning of the analysis was summarized.

Critically analyzed the topic. Discussion of the topic was anchored in fact and reason. Information about significant aspects of the topic were analyzed from the perspective of key related concepts. Either the analysis or summary lacked some level of detail.

Somewhat critically analyzed the topic. Discussion of the topic was minimally anchored in fact and reason. Information about significant aspects of the topic were somewhat analyzed from the perspective of key related concepts. Analysis and summary included but lacks a significant level of analysis and discussion.

Minimally discussed the topic without supporting facts and reasons. Poor organization of the information and limited level of detail.

II. Consideration for the impact of leadership, information technology, or business on institutional constituents.

Demonstrates an extensive understanding of the topic’s relationship to leadership, information technology, or business.

Demonstrates a good understanding of the topic’s relationship to leadership, information technology, or business.

Demonstrates a fair understanding of the topic’s relationship to leadership, information technology, or business.

Demonstrates a minimal understanding of the topic’s relationship to leadership, information technology, or business.

III. Effective analytical and communication skills

Demonstrates a professional level of skills associated with formatting, grammar, spelling, syntax, and use of numbers.

Demonstrates acceptable skills associated with formatting, grammar, spelling, syntax, and use of numbers.

Needs minor improvement in skills associated with formatting, grammar, spelling, syntax, and use of numbers.

Needs significant improvement in skills associated formatting, grammar, spelling, syntax, and use of numbers.

IV. Knowledge of genres, paradigms, theories, literature or trends in business, criminal justice, education, English, health sciences, history, information technology, math, nursing, psychology, religion, or student personnel services.

Subject is identified, realistic, and grounded in a recognized genre, paradigm, theory, literature, or trend.

Subject is identified and is realistic, but it lacks grounding in a recognized genre, paradigm, theory, literature, or trend.

Subject is identified but is not realistic or grounded in a recognized genre, paradigm, theory, literature, or trend.

Subject area is not established.

V. Required Components of the assignment as listed in the assignment directions.

All required parts of the assignment as listed in the assignment directions are included.

Minor information is missing from the required components of the assignment as listed in the assignment directions.

Significant information is missing from the required components of the assignment as listed in the assignment directions.

The assignment lacks the detail needed to meet the requirements for the components of the assignment as listed in the assignment directions.

,

Qualitative Methods

Week 3

*

Introduction

  • Designing qualitative methods for a research proposal
  • Types of Data Collection
  • Data Collection Tools

*

*

Interviews

  • Types of Interviews
  • One on One – ex: Leaders (Boss, principals, etc.)
  • Focus Groups – ex: Workers (employees, teachers, etc.)
  • Ethnography – ex: Field Work – becoming a part of others community

Data Collection Tools

Protocols (open ended questions created by researcher) – can be used for all interviews

*

Examples In Class

-Follow order exactly for your chosen type of data collection tool.

-Interview Protocol has place for researcher notes (designed as one on one)

-Focus Group Protocol is organized to help participants feel comfortable participating in a group. Each page has area to answer questions.

-Ethnography – 5 areas clearly indicating process.

*

  • All participants must be ensured anonymity. Therefore, names should not be collected. Only demographic information is allowed so that you can categorized responses in your analysis. See additional support below to provide more understanding about Ethics for protecting of human subjects in research.
  • There are legal requirements for ensuring protection of human subjects.

https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index?item=11

https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/read-the-belmont-report/index.html

https://www.purdue.edu/research/dimensions/important-considerations-for-protecting-human-research-participants/

https://www.evergreen.edu/humansubjectsreview/confidentiality

*

Qualitative Data Collection

Qualitative Support

Grounded theory:

What are the attitudes of elderly people with stroke towards the daily use of assistive devices and technologies?

Phenomenology:

What role does the therapist’s spirituality play in the treatment of his or her patients?

How do female high school teachers who have been physically assaulted by students overcome their fears so they can effectively teach?

Ethnography:

How do adolescent Latinas/Latinos conceptualize classroom participation processes shape active oral participation?

Narrative inquiry:

How does a good everyday life come about when living with chronic rheumatic conditions?

Case study:

What strategies are being used by small businesses that have effective and viable workplace wellness

*

,

MKaeli Assig me t 3.1 Coachi g-style of Leadership

CEO Pre-Trai i g I terview Protocol

Hello a d tha k you for agreei g to meet with me today a d your willi g ess to participate i this research study. If you would please review, sig , a d date the co se t form i fro t of you. This co se t form allows me to use i formatio gathered from today’s i terview. As a remi der, this research study is e tirely co fide tial a d your ame will ot be attached to a y research data, or me tio ed i the fi al report. We have a hour a d half scheduled for our i terview today. I appreciate your participatio , a d I wa t to be respectful of your time. I will ask ope e ded questio s, taki g otes, a d recordi g our discussio . Our sessio is desig ed to be more of a relaxed co versatio , rather tha a questio -a swer heari g. Give the guara tee of a o ymity, I hope you will thoughtfully co sider the questio s prese ted a d feel comfortable bei g authe tic a d detailed with your respo ses. Please k ow that there will be occasio s where I eed to ask follow-up questio s based o your a swers. Fi ally i a effort to ease i to our co versatio s, our first topics are i te ded to help me gai some i sight to you perso ally, your formal educatio , backgrou d i formatio about your experie ce, as well as positio a d respo sibilities with the orga izatio .

I troductio Tell me a little bit about yourself? Where did you go to college? What did you study? Graduate degrees? Activities/Sports? What were your career aspiratio s whe you left school? Where did you work prior to comi g here, a d what was your title? How do you view yourself professio ally? What are your career aspiratio s ow? What is your favorite thi g about worki g here? What do like the least? What attracted you to work here i itially? What, if a ythi g, would cause you to leave this orga izatio ?

Researcher otes: Next we will focus o your role a d respo sibilities with the orga izatio . O ce agai , I will be taki g otes a d recordi g your respo ses. I wa t you to feel comfortable elaborati g o your respo ses, a d I will ask you follow-up questio s based o your respo ses.

Role a d Respo sibilities How lo g have you bee with the orga izatio ? Were you hired for, or promoted i to, your curre t positio ? Describe the o -boardi g process with the compa y whe you were hired. Has the process cha ged si ce the ?

(Y) How a d why did it cha ge a d how? (N) Do you feel you were you properly prepared for your role? Why or Why ot?

Describe your scope of respo sibilities for your curre t positio ? Have they cha ged over time? What skills a d abilities do you believe are eeded to be successful i your curre t positio ? How do you view your role i the orga izatio ? Has it cha ged over time? How ma y people to you supervise directly? Ca you describe your leadership style? How would your team describe you, a d your leadership style? As the leader of your team, what are your top three stre gths? Why do you believe this? As the leader of your team, what are your top three weak esses? Why do you believe this? What are you doi g to improve i these areas?

Dr. Jaocb Bryant

Dr. Jaocb Bryant
Sample Interview Protocol

MKaeli Assig me t 3.1

Researcher otes: Tha k you for your respo ses to the role a d respo sibility based questio s. Our ext questio s will be related to orga izatio al culture as they relate to employee e gageme t a d orga izatio al citize ship. As you have do e with the previous questio s, please feel comfortable to elaborate o your a swers, a d I will ask follow-up questio s as eeded to elicit more i formatio .

Orga izatio al Culture a d Employee E gageme t What is the missio of the orga izatio ? Would you describe the culture of the orga izatio ? How do you as a leader embody the culture? What are the values of the orga izatio ? How do you model these values? What are the orga izatio ’s Key Performa ce I dicators (KPI’s)? How have your strategies impacted your orga izatio al performa ce? What role does employee e gageme t i orga izatio al performa ce? Do you use a y e gageme t strategies?

(Y) Which o es? How you measure their efficacy? (N) Why ot?

Describe your team’s level of commitme t to the values a d missio of the orga izatio ? Why do you believe this?

Researcher otes: Tha k you for your respo ses o the culture a d e gageme t based questio s. Our ext sets of questio s will look at the role that professio al relatio ships have i the e ha ceme t of orga izatio al performa ce. We will co ti ue to follow the same procedure as we have bee . Please feel comfortable to elaborate with your a swers, a d I will ask follow-up questio s as eeded.

Relatio ship Describe your relatio ship with your team members?

What ca you do to stre gthe these relatio ships a d their orga izatio al commitme t? Do you have a strategy for the professio al developme t of your team?

(Y) Ca describe what is a d how it is impleme ted? (N) Why ot?

Do you coach or me tor your team members? What importa ce do you place o professio al developme t? How could a coachi g-based leadership style impact your relatio ships with team members?

What impact could modeli g this behavior have o employee commitme t? What impact could modeli g this behavior have o orga izatio al performa ce?

Do you have a successio pla ? (Y) How is it ma aged? How will it be impleme ted? Is it ope ly commu icated? (N) Why ot?

What do you wa t your legacy to be?

Researcher otes: Tha k you for your respo ses to the relatio ship based questio s. Our ext sets of questio s will look at the role that commu icatio tech iques play i support orga izatio al values. We will co ti ue to follow the same procedure as we have bee . Please feel comfortable to elaborate as much as you would like with your a swers, a d I will ask follow-up questio s as eeded.

Dr. Jaocb Bryant

MKaeli Assig me t 3.1 Commu icatio How ofte do you meet with your team each week?

What do you discuss? How ofte do you meet with your team members i dividually each week?

What do you discuss? Whe you speak to your team, how do you ma age your commu icatio ?

Why? Whe you speak to team members, how do you ma age you commu icatio ?

Why? How ca a coachi g-style of leadership e ha ce the commu icatio of your team? How ca e ha ced commu icatio i flue ce orga izatio al efficie cy a d orga izatio al performa ce?

Researcher otes: I this fi al sectio I wa t to allow you to have the opportu ity to share with me a y other i formatio that you feel I should co sider i my research project. These last few questio s will co clude the i terview process.

Co clusio Have you ever worked for a coachi g-based leader?

(Y) How did they ma ifest this style? How did it i flue ce your professio al developme t? (N) how do you thi k you could have be efited from a coachi g-based leader?

How ca a coachi g-based style of leadership be efit your successor i this positio ? How ca a well-executed successio pla e ha ce orga izatio al performa ce? Is there a ythi g you feel I have overlooked i our discussio ? Is there a ythi g you would like to add?

I wa t to tha k you for your help with our project. Do you have a y questio s for me about the research project?

Agai , tha k you so much for your participatio today.

Researcher otes:

Date:

Time:

Place:

E viro me t Setti g:

I dividual Code:

Dr. Jaocb Bryant

Successful Learning Focus Group Protocol

Hello, my name is ______________ and I am a graduate student conducting research on what communication practices that promotes the most successful learning in a classroom. Thank you to this group for agreeing to meet with me today. I have an hour to an hour and half scheduled for our interview today. I want to honor any time constraints that any of you have today.

Since this is a group setting I want to establish some norms for our conversation: 1. We are going to go through a series of questions, topic by topic. I would like for

everyone to have the opportunity to speak during this interview. 2. Please only allow one person to speak at a time and be courteous of others who would

like to speak. 3. Feel free to treat this as a discussion as you may agree or disagree with what others are

saying. 4. Please do not worry about have different opinions or answers than everyone else. There

is no right or wrong answers to this interview. 5. You do not have to answer every question. 6. I will be tape recording this session and confidentiality will be covered in all parts of this

interview. No names will be revealed in this study. 7. Does anyone have questions before we begin?

Dr. Jaocb Bryant
Focus Group Protocol

Our first questions are built to help me gain background information about you and your experiences in teaching.

Introduction What experiences in teaching do you have? Do you have experience in education other than teaching? What do you enjoy most about teaching?

Research notes:

Our next few questions will focus primarily on learning. As teachers you see learning every day. Once again, I will be taking notes and recording your responses. I want you to feel comfortable elaborating on your responses and discussing the questions as a group. Remember it is okay to have a different opinion or answer than someone else.

Learning How do you define the concept of learning? What types and variations of learning do you see in your classroom?

How do these types of learning vary by child? What conditions are necessary in your classroom for learning to take place?

How do these conditions affect learning? How do you know when students have learned something?

Is there any type of assessments that you use to determine if learning has occurred?

Research notes:

Thank you for your responses to the learning questions. Our next set of questions will focus primarily on communication and how it is used in the classroom. Again, your responses may be different from one another and it is okay to have a difference of opinion.

Communication How do you communicate with your class? How effective do you feel in your ability to use effective communication strategies with your classroom?

Why is this important? What role does your personality play in the communication you have with your class?

How do you think your personality impacts your students learning? How do your students communicate with each other in your classroom?

How does their communication with each other impact their learning? Positive and negative communication strategies are parts of classroom communication. Which is more effective for students to learn from? Why?


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *