Examine Uustals Nine Step Decision-Making Model Examine Uustals Nine Step Decision-Making Model Uustal (1993) proposed a decision-making model that provides concrete steps in which to arrive at a morally acceptable solution when faced with an ethical dilemma. What type of an ethical dilemma have you encountered in the clinical setting? How can the decision-making model identified by Uustals 9 steps be applied to this situation? Be specific when describing each of the nine steps. ? BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com March 22, 2019, 12:30 am ad1c9bdddf https://brainmass.com/health-sciences/health-care-ethics/uustal-s-nine-step-decision-making-model-503358 ORDER INSTRUCTIONS-COMPLIANT NURSING PAPERS Solution Preview I have encountered an ethical dilemma in the clinical setting in which I had to make a decision as to which patient would be treated first in a situation in which I could only treat one patient at a time, although both patients had arrived for treatment at the same time. Step one would be to clearly define the objective that is to be achieved, and in this case the objective was to ensure that both patients received the treatment that they needed based on the priority of their medical conditions. Step two would be to identify and understand all of the options that are ? You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computers spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper ? in silence and then aloud ? before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes. Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages. Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at ?padding? to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor. The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument. Examine Uustals Nine Step Decision-Making Model Order Now

ADDITIONAL DETAILS

Uustals Nine Step Decision-Making Model

Introduction

The Uustals model is a nine-step decision-making process that helps managers analyze the decision-making process in a structured way. It was originally developed by H. Gordon Uustal and published in his book, Decision Analysis: A Practical Guide to Quantitative Methods for Business Decisions (Harvard Business School Press, 2001), which I highly recommend. The steps are presented below in order from most important to least important.

Uustals model is a nine-step process used for decision making that helps managers analyze the decision-making process in a structured way

The Uustals model is a nine-step process used for decision making that helps managers analyze the decision-making process in a structured way.

The steps of the Uustals model are:

Problem/Opportunity Identification and Analysis (1): This step considers what problems you face and how you can solve them. It also involves defining your problem, identifying opportunities, assessing risks and opportunities together with other stakeholders.
Decision Making (2): In this step, you make decisions about what actions should be taken based on your analysis of data collected during previous stages such as identification of problems and opportunities along with their possible solutions.
Implementation (3): Implementation involves carrying out all necessary tasks related to implementing an action plan developed during this stage using information gathered during previous steps including identifying resources required for implementation etc., setting targets for completion by certain periods based on performance expectations set earlier at each level within organization hierarchy; once completed successfully then move onto next level where another cycle begins again until complete mission objectives achieved

Step 1: Identify and define the decision to be made.

In this step, you need to define the decision that needs to be made. This can be anything from whether or not to buy a new car to whether or not to go on vacation with your family in another city. The first step of any decision-making model is identifying what task you’re going after, so let’s begin by asking ourselves: What problem do we want our solution for?

A lot of people start their process without setting goals first because they think these will come naturally when they start working on their project—but this might not be true! If your goal isn’t clear yet and it’s still too early for either of us (you) and (me), then there are two things I’d like for us both do right away today: define what kind of problem we’re trying solve with our project before continuing; also set aside some time later today so that both myself and myself alone can write down those answers together while looking at pictures online.”

Step 2: List all the alternatives.

Now that you have a list of all possible alternatives and their benefits, it’s time to decide which ones are relevant. If your boss asks for suggestions on how to improve the company, you may want to include options like “hire more people” or “do more research.”

However, if your boss asks what the best way is for you to spend your time at work after hours (and weekends), then this would be an appropriate time to bring up ideas such as:

Going on vacation with friends/family members;
Taking classes at local colleges;
Spending time with pets or pets’ owners;

These are just some examples of activities that might be considered outside-the-office—and therefore not part of your job description.

Step 3: Identify the decision criteria by which alternatives will be judged.

When it comes to decision-making, the first step is to define the problem.

Defining your goals before you start on a solution will help you stay focused on what matters most and make sure that your goal is attainable.

The next step is identifying the criteria by which alternatives will be judged. This can be anything from “does this solve my problem?” to “how much does this cost?” or even something as simple as “is this easier than doing nothing at all?” If there are multiple criteria, prioritize them based on how important they are for achieving success in each area of life (e.g., family happiness).

Step 4: Allocate weights to the criteria.

The fourth step is to allocate weights to the criteria. This will help you determine which criteria are most important and make your decision more informed.

Weighting is a way of determining how much importance a criterion should have when determining your choice. It’s important that you set weights based on the situation, so that they’re consistent with your organization’s values and goals. Weighting can take several forms:

A single number (e.g., 1 point) represents an extreme case where a criterion has no impact whatsoever; anything less than this value would clearly be unacceptable in most cases
A range of numbers (e.g., 0–10 points) indicates that there is some difference between two or more options being considered, with 10 being an average score and 0 being an extreme score

Step 5: Develop a rating scale for each criterion.

Rating scales can be used to rate the importance of each criterion. To develop a rating scale, first ask yourself the following questions:

How important is it that my decision-making model be validated?
What are some ways in which my decision-making model may need to be validated?

Next, identify each criterion that you want to measure and write down how you think it should be rated. For example, if one of your criteria is “number of hours per week,” then write down 1 through 10 with 0 being the least important and 10 being most important. Then rank all ten items based on their relative importance (1 being most important). Finally add up these numbers for each item so that there are ten total rankings for each criterion (1 -10). Next create tables for each table by ranking all possible options from highest rank value down into descending order; this process will help ensure consistency across all variables when comparing data later during analysis procedures such as regression analysis or factor analysis methods using software programs like SPSS Statistics 19+20+.

Step 6: Rate each alternative against each criterion.

Once you’ve decided on a set of criteria, rate each alternative against each criterion. The process is similar to the one used in brainstorming: Your goal is not to come up with ideas for what you want but rather for how good your options are compared to each other.

To rate an alternative against a criterion, simply write down your opinion about how good or bad it is for that criterion. For example, if your criteria were “Satisfies Customer Needs,” then you could say something like:

Satisfies Customer Needs = Yes/No
Satisfied Customers = Number of satisfied customers over time

Step 7: Multiply each alternative’s score on each criterion by the weight of that criterion. The resulting numbers are called weighted scores.

The weights are the importance of each criterion and they should be based on your company’s needs, values and goals. For example, if you have a requirement for an existing product that has been around for years and has been proven to meet your customer’s needs, then you would probably choose this option over another new product that might offer more features but not as much experience in solving similar problems (this would be an example of value because it helps solve real-world problems).

Step 8: Decide which alternative has the highest total weighted score.

You have now taken the weighted scores for all of your criteria, and you have a total weighted score. This is the most important step in this model because it determines which alternative has the highest total weighted score.

To decide which alternative has the highest total weighted score, multiply all of your individual criteria’ weights by their respective weights:

Weighted Scores = Sum (summed up by each criterion) x Weight/total weight
Example: If I had three alternatives with equal weight but one was higher than another two, then my final decision would be based on what I think is best. In this case, my priority would go to option A since it scored higher than B and C combined while having less cost than D or E – meaning that if we were making a purchase decision based on our needs at work versus those outside of work we’d choose option A over B but not as much as C because this model only considers costs associated with using specific products/services rather than personal preferences when making decisions about spending money on various types of goods and services available throughout society today.”

Step 9: Calculate expected monetary value (EMV) of each alternative. EMV= P(outcome) X value of outcome.

EMV = P(outcome) X value of outcome.

The EMV is a measure of the expected payoff of each alternative. It can be used to compare alternatives, such as whether one alternative pays off more than another or if two alternatives have equal payoffs. For example, you might want to know how much money an investment would earn over your lifetime and what it would cost in terms of time spent managing your portfolio (including taxes). You could use this information to help determine which investment strategy is best for you financially by calculating EMVs for different strategies using different time periods.

Conclusion

Uustals model is an effective decision-making tool that helps managers analyze the decision-making process in a structured way. It is used by many companies to make better decisions based on their needs and requirements by following these nine steps:

Identify and define the decision to be made
List all the alternatives
Identify the decision criteria by which alternatives will be judged
Allocate weights to each criterion based on its importance as well as strength of evidence supporting its relevance (e.g., some criteria are more important than others). This determines which alternative has the highest total weighted score which allows it win over other alternatives when compared against these criteria; however, this can create bias towards certain alternatives since they may have been given more weight than others if this was not accounted for properly when rating each alternative against each criterion; therefore, before going any further it’s best practice always ensure you’ve identified all relevant criteria before rating them against one another so nothing goes wrong during later stages of planning process where final rankings will need to be determined accordingly; next step would be deciding which alternative has higher total weighted score after applying weights assigned earlier stepwisely onto each criterion individually then multiplying each alternative’s score per criterion individually again according as per above mentioned formula [P(outcome) x Value(outcome)]= EMV]; finally calculate expected monetary value (EMV) of each alternative taking into account how much money would change hands if selected option was selected instead

Nursing Worker

Examine Uustals Nine Step Decision-Making Model