PSY 362 Topic 2 CLC Ethics and IRB Psychology Essay
PSY 362 Topic 2 CLC Ethics and IRB Psychology Essay
This is a Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) assignment. You will be assigned group in class. We have navigated through much research to date. As you know, ethical considerations are vital during this process. After reading about Milgram’s compliance experiment and many of the early studies in social psychology, it becomes clear that participants in social psychology have suffered harm. There are safeguards in place today within the American Psychological Association’s Code of Ethics (2016) with regard to research. Institutional Review Boards have also been put in place to protect both human and animal research participants.Imagine your CLC group sits on an Institutional Review Board (IRB) and someone like Phillip Zombardo or Stanley Milgram provides you with a research proposal to conduct the same experiment(s).Task: Do some research and chose an unethical study that has been conducted thus far (i.e., Monster Study, Aversion Project, Dr. Money/David Reimer, Learned Helplessness).A quick internet search will reveal other ideas.
Your job is to approve the study, approve with modifications, or reject the study completely. Using the APA Code of Ethics, justify your group’s determination. The code of ethics can be found at http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx
Create a PowerPoint presentation, of 8-12 slides (slide count does not include the title and reference slide), in which your group presents their decision. Your PowerPoint should include:
- Provide a summary of the experiment.
- Identify some general ethical concerns with the experiment.
- Using the APA Code of Ethics, identify at least five specific ethic codes that were violated with this study. Be sure to explain why there was a code violation.
- Provide your decision as an IRB if you will approve the study, approve it with modifications, or flat out reject it all together.
Use two to three scholarly resources for support. Your textbook is a viable source. Resources should be listed on the last slide.
Include speaker notes below each content-related slide that represent what would be said if giving the presentation in person. Expand upon the information included in the slide and do not simply restate it. Please ensure the speaker notes include 50-75 words per slide.
NOTE: Save and upload your PowerPoint as a PDF if it’s too large
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, including an APA formatted reference slide, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turn-it-in. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
ADDITIONAL DETAILS
Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) Ethics and IRB Psychology
Introduction
The Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) is a group that meets every other week to discuss each other’s ongoing research projects and provide peer feedback. The CLC provides a safe space for students to share their ideas, questions, and concerns about their studies. By sharing your ideas with the group, you can get valuable feedback from others who are in similar situations. Sometimes it can be hard to “see the forest for the trees” when you are in the middle of your own study or analysis; by sharing your work with others who have also completed similar projects, we can help point out potential pitfalls along the way!
Collaborative Learning Community
-
Collaborative Learning Community (CLC)
-
A group that meets every other week to discuss each other’s ongoing research projects and provide peer feedback.
-
It is important to share your ideas with the group, so you can get valuable feedback from others who are in similar situations.
The Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) is a group that meets every other week to discuss each other’s ongoing research projects and provide peer feedback.
The CLC is a group that meets every other week to discuss each other’s ongoing research projects and provide peer feedback.
The CLC provides a space for students to share their work and get feedback from their peers. This can be done through presentations or video conferences, depending on the needs of the project being discussed.
Why is the CLC important?
The CLC is a place where you can share your work with others, receive feedback, advice and guidance. You can learn from others’ experiences and new methods and techniques. You may find it helpful to consider the following questions:
-
What are my goals? How do I want to improve in this area? What do I expect from a coach or mentor (for example)?
-
What evidence supports my belief that collaboration is important for me personally or professionally? This could include doing research on topics related to collaboration within an organization; reading books written by experts in this field; interviewing colleagues who have been successful at collaborating; etc., as well as asking yourself whether there are any obstacles that might prevent you from achieving your goals (e.g., lack of time).
By sharing your ideas with the group, you can get valuable feedback from others who are in similar situations.
By sharing your ideas with the group, you can get valuable feedback from others who are in similar situations. You might be surprised by how much they have learned and how much they have struggled with their own studies. This can help them see what you are doing right and wrong, as well as give them ideas for improvements on their own projects.
Sometimes it can be hard to “see the forest for the trees” when you are in the middle of your own study or analysis.
Sometimes it can be hard to “see the forest for the trees” when you are in the middle of your own study or analysis. When this happens, it is important to step back and look at your work from a distance. This will help you see where you are going wrong and how to make improvements on your project. It is also helpful to get feedback from others who have expertise in psychology or anthropology of education, as well as those who have worked on similar projects before (and perhaps even done so under similar circumstances).
What should I share with my group?
The key to a successful ethics and IRB psychology project is to share your ideas, but not your data.
It’s important that you share how you came up with those ideas. But don’t share any of the results or conclusions drawn from them. This can be difficult for some people who want to give credit where it’s due, but do not want their colleagues’ research projects being used in any way other than what they were intended for (i.e., education).
Conclusion
The CLC is a great way to get feedback from others, especially if you are in the midst of your own research. By sharing your ideas with the group, you can get valuable feedback from others who are in similar situations. Sometimes it can be hard to “see the forest for the trees” when you are in the middle of your own study or analysis. You might even find that someone else has had similar problems and come up with a solution that helps!
Leave a Reply