NURS 4115 Discussion week 2 Paper.

To prepare for this Discussion:

• Review the case study “Improving the Health of the Poor in Mexico.” Then, prepare your response to the following questions:
  • How do politics and economics influence health and health care?
  • What might the benefits be of awarding the mothers cash grants?
  • What social problems might be created by giving the mothers cash grants?NURS 4115 Discussion week 2 Paper.
  • Do you think the resources were ethically distributed? (Think about stereotyping.)

Permalink: https://collepals.com//nurs-4115-discussion-week-2-paper/

What changes do you think should be made to the program, if any?

• • If the program were to be discontinued for any reason, what could you, as a nurse, say that might help to maintain funding?
  • Do you think a similar program might work in your community? Why or why not?

By Day 3

Post your response to the following prompts:

Explain how politics and economics may influence health and the health care system from your own perspective. Analyze whether the political and/or economic systems play a major role in your or your family’s access to health and explain why. Then, describe how government intervention might benefit a health care system. Be specific and provide examples.NURS 4115 Discussion week 2 Paper.

Support your response with references from the professional nursing literature.

1. Explained how politics and economics influence health and healthcare.

In the United States, politics and economics play a significant role in health and healthcare. The largest healthcare program in the United States since the 1960s is Medicare and Medicaid, which are funded via payroll taxes (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2014). The government has regulations in place for determining who can have access healthcare in this country. Medicare, which is regulated by the federal government, provides health insurance for Americans aged 65 and older regardless of income or medical history (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2014). Some younger individuals also may qualify that have disabilities that receive Social Security Disability Insurance (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2014). Therefore, politics do influence health and healthcare in this country since the government has the power to regulate and set special requirements for use.

 

2.  Analyzed possible benefits and problems that might be generated by giving the mothers the cash grants.

 

For the reading by Levine (2007, pp. 65-72) possible benefits for giving the mothers the cash grant include helping to increase the families’ income, thereby providing them with food and other necessary resources. The cash grants helped to increase school enrollment and attendance by giving the families money to access preventative care for immunizations to prevent illnesses, basic health care services, and nutrition counseling (Levine, 2007, pp. 65-72). Possible problems that may arise from giving the cash grants could be that once so many people have money to access healthcare, that there may not be enough medical providers to care for those in need.NURS 4115 Discussion week 2 Paper. The healthcare system may not be prepared for the increasing number of individuals who now have the financial means to receive care. Therefore, it may not be enough “supply” to meet the increased “demand” for healthcare services.

 

3.  Analyzed possible ethical dilemmas when promoting health for a select population using cash grants such as equal distribution within the population, possible social problems, or continuation of the program.

 

Possible dilemmas that could be created by this program could be that the community-at-large may want to have input on how the money is spent by the mothers receiving the grants. People may also feel that singling out the poor is unethical as well. When I think of the cash grants it sort of reminds my of the food stamp welfare program, as only certain people qualify and the money can only be spent on certain items. The food stamps can only be spent for cold food items but many people want more restrictions on how the government assistance should be spent, as well as more restrictions on who qualifies for services. I feel that the cash grants could also create the same issues due to people wanting to ensure that the money is being spent appropriately and being provided to those with the greatest need. NURS 4115 Discussion week 2 Paper.

 

4.  Recommended approaches to assure continuation of the program if funding were threatened.

 

If the program funding were to be threatened, I would show statistical evidence on how the program works. As the article mentioned, that many rural children dropped out of school by the 6^th or 9^th grades, that there were high incidence of preventable childhood and adult illnesses, high infant mortality, and poor reproductive outcomes (Levine, 2007, pp. 65-72). The cash grant program has helped to improve school attendance and enrollment, as well as improving child and adult health, reduce illnesses, and improve nutritional health (Levine, 2007, pp. 65-72).

 

5.  Determine whether a similar program might work in the community the student lives in.

 

I currently do not live in the typical community that may need a program of this sort but I grew up in a single parent home in a poor neighborhood. A program of this type may have benefited the community I grew up in, and may have even helped my mom who was a single parent. I do believe that the program would need regulations for who would qualify and regulations set on how the money can be spent to ensure the money is not being misused.

References

 

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2014). Medicare program- General information.

Retrieved January 18, 2018, from https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-General-Information/MedicareGenInfo/index.html

Levine, R. (2007). Improving the Health of the Poor in Mexico. In Case studies in global

 

health: Millions saved. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett.NURS 4115 Discussion week 2 Paper.

 

 

 

ADDITIONAL DETAILS 

How politics and economics may influence health and the health care system

Introduction

It’s no secret that the health care system in the United States is in crisis. The high cost of medical care and insurance, along with limited access to medical care, has led to a rise in disease and an increase in mortality rates compared to other countries around the world. While we may think that our healthcare system is broken, there are many reasons why it doesn’t have to be this way: politics and economics can help us understand how our country’s health problems came about—and how they can be fixed! In this article we’ll explore some key factors behind both sides of this equation: politics vs economics—what influences them most?

Global health initiatives

Global health initiatives are programs designed to improve the health of people around the world. They include the World Health Organization, UNICEF and the World Bank. These organizations have worked together to implement projects that focus on improving access to healthcare and sanitation facilities in developing countries.

Will the US become a consumer-driven system?

What is a consumer-driven system?

A consumer-driven health care system is one that bases its decisions on the best interests of consumers and not just providers. In other words, it’s about giving patients more choice over what they receive from their medical treatments (and paying less for those services).

How does the US compare to other countries?

The US has some of the most expensive health care in the world—but we also rank among the highest in terms of life expectancy and infant mortality rates. The reasons for this are unclear, but one likely contributor is our low rate of preventative care: While many developed nations focus on preventing disease before it develops into an issue—as opposed to treating symptoms once they occur—the U.S.’s focus has been on curing conditions after they’ve already taken hold rather than preventing them altogether. This could mean higher costs down the road if prevention isn’t prioritized alongside treatment options prior to onset.”>

Which countries are the healthiest?

In terms of life expectancy, the US is not the healthiest country. It ranks 40th out of a list of 144 nations, behind countries like Japan, France and Australia. It’s even behind China and India!

Health care spending in the U.S. is also much higher than any other developed nation: 6% of our GDP (gross domestic product) goes towards health care costs—more than twice what it does in Germany or Switzerland at 3%. This means more money spent on medical bills but less saved for retirement or savings accounts because there are fewer sick people to pay for with their own money (and less taxes paid).

Managing costs will be both a challenge and an opportunity.

The United States spends more on health care than any other country. In fact, the US government spends more than $2 trillion a year on Medicare and Medicaid alone. But even with this enormous amount of money spent on health care, it’s clear that Americans are not getting value for their dollars. Our health care system is inefficient and fragmented, leaving many uninsured or underinsured individuals without access to quality insurance coverage when they need it most — especially those who live in rural areas or small towns where there aren’t enough doctors available nearby (or anywhere).

As costs rise due to aging populations and new technology like artificial intelligence (AI), it will become increasingly challenging for governments around the world—including yours—to manage both short-term expenses while also meeting long-term goals such as improving overall population health outcomes through better prevention strategies like vaccines against vaccine preventable diseases like measles which were once common among children before vaccination programs were implemented worldwide decades ago.”

How do we ensure that everyone has the same access to health insurance?

How do we ensure that everyone has the same access to health insurance?

The United States is a country where people can choose their own healthcare, but there are still some things that need improvement. For example, many people have trouble affording their premiums or out-of-pocket costs for medical care. This can lead them to skip routine checkups or other preventive measures because they cannot afford it. In addition, some people may not be aware of their options when it comes time for them get sick; this means that if someone does need treatment early on in life then suddenly finds themselves without any coverage whatsoever (or even worse), then they’ll have no choice but spend thousands upon thousands more dollars on unnecessary procedures such as surgeries which could’ve been avoided altogether if only there had been proper health insurance throughout those years growing up!

So how do we make sure everyone has access

How do we talk about health disparities?

Health disparities are differences in health status, health care and health outcomes among specific population groups. There are many reasons for these differences, but race, ethnicity and socioeconomic status are often cited as key factors that influence them.

Health disparities are a complex problem and there’s no easy solution to this issue—but we can all take steps to help reduce them by learning more about what it means to be a part of a minority group when you’re seeking treatment or care at your local hospital or clinic.

A snapshot of how politics and economics influence our healthcare system.

In this article, we’ll take a look at how politics and economics influence our healthcare system. We’ll explore how the US compares to other countries in terms of government spending on health care, insurance coverage rates, and more. We’ll also examine some recent changes in the structure of our health care system that have led to increased consumer choice for consumers seeking better value for their money.

We’ll start by looking at politics—specifically how it impacts your ability to access affordable health care through Obamacare or any other private option available through an employer-based plan or as an individual purchaser with an HSA/HRA account (Health Savings Account/Health Reimbursement Account).

Next up: Economics! How does this relate back into economics 101?

Conclusion

The healthcare system is not a static entity, and it will continue to evolve in response to new challenges. The current political climate has created more opportunities for change, but it also creates uncertainty about what the future of healthcare will look like. We hope that this article gave readers an understanding of where we’re headed as a country and how they can get involved in shaping its trajectory.