r you: finding out that the leaders of your organization have acted illegally or finding out that the leaders of your organization have acted unethically. Why?

 

MORE INFO 

Are ethics determined by a group of people or by an individual?

Introduction

The question of the origin of ethics has a long history and the subject of intense debate. For centuries, human beings have debated whether morality is innate or a result of upbringing and cultural training. The idea of authenticity has also been used to discuss ethics. Some argue that there is no absolute authority on what is ethical and what isn’t, whereas others maintain that there are universal values which can be gleaned from religious traditions and other sources

The question of the origin of ethics has a long history and the subject of intense debate.

The question of the origin of ethics has a long history and the subject of intense debate. Ethics is an ancient subject, having been debated since the dawn of time. It has been argued that ethics are determined by groups, such as societies or religions; however, others maintain that it is an individual’s responsibility to think about what is right and wrong in any given situation.

The issue remains controversial because there are many different ways to define “ethics.” Some people think you should only do what you believe is ethical; others believe that it’s important for everyone else around you not only know what’s ethical but also agree with your decision before making one yourself (for example: if someone asks me whether I think stealing money from my wallet would be considered unethical behavior then I’d probably say no).

Before there was a written word, human beings thought deeply about right and wrong actions.

Ethics are not universal, but they are a product of the human mind. Ethics are not determined by culture or religion—they can be found in every culture at all times and in every religion at all times, but only because we have the capacity to think deeply about right and wrong actions.

Ethics are not determined by science—they can’t be explained by experiments or observations made with technology, such as microscopes or telescopes (and even if you were able to do so, it would still be difficult).

Ethics aren’t determined by philosophy either: There is no such thing as “the Good” or “the True”; there’s just what works best for each person based on their own experiences and beliefs about how things should function within society.

Many people believe that ethics are not universal but may differ from person to person or culture to culture.

Many people believe that ethics are not universal but may differ from person to person or culture to culture. The idea of ethics being subjective is an important one, because it means that each individual will have a different opinion on what constitutes ethical behavior.

Questions about whether an action is right or wrong depend on many factors: who you are, your situation at the time (e.g., if you’re in danger), and how society views certain actions as acceptable or unacceptable. For example, if someone steals food from another person’s home without permission and then tries to hide their theft by offering them some money for the stolen goods—which is considered stealing in our society—this would not be considered unethical behavior simply because it doesn’t fit within our standards for what constitutes “right” or “wrong.” However, this same act might be considered unethical depending on where in the world it occurred: perhaps stealing from someone who lives near starvation would be viewed differently than stealing from someone who lives comfortably off their inheritance money every month (or even during a recession).

Some argue that ethics does not exist because there is no absolute authority on what is ethical and what isn’t.

Some argue that ethics does not exist because there is no absolute authority on what is ethical and what isn’t. They say that you should follow your own moral compass, which may or may not coincide with the views of others.

This position has been called “ethical relativism”, meaning that different people have different values and moral codes, and therefore it’s impossible to say one way or another whether an action is right or wrong (or even if it should be done at all).

Another version of this argument states that we cannot know whether our actions are right or wrong until after they’ve happened; thus we cannot even begin to guess how anyone else would judge them. This view is called “ethical non-cognitivism” since it rejects any sort of objective truth about ethics—it says they’re just opinions based on personal experiences or cultural norms rather than anything universal about human nature itself.*

Aristotle maintained that moral virtue is a disposition to behave in the right manner and as a mean between extremes of deficiency and excess, which are vices.

Aristotle’s virtue ethics is a framework for thinking about ethics. The basic idea behind it is that moral virtue is a disposition to behave in the right manner and as a mean between extremes of deficiency and excess, which are vices.

Aristotle maintained that moral virtue was an excellence or perfection of character, which was not dependent on external goods or wealth but rather internal disposition (see also: phronesis).

There are many ethical frameworks, including those that come from religious traditions.

Ethics is often a source of tension in the world. Some people believe that ethics should be determined by a group of people, while others believe that they should be determined by an individual.

Religious traditions have their own frameworks for ethical thought and behavior, but these frameworks are not always accepted by all cultures. The Bible and Koran are examples of religious texts that outline ethical principles. The Ten Commandments are an example of a religious ethical framework; they can also serve as a guide for anyone who wants to follow them (see Exodus 20:3-17).

The Golden Rule—which says “do unto others as you would want done unto yourself”—can be found in many different religious texts from all over the world; it serves as an important guide for how we treat others because it expresses our desire not only for ourselves but also for others’ rights and happiness (see Matthew 7:12).

There is no consensus on the origin or nature of ethics or morality, but it has been debated for centuries.

The origin of ethics has been debated for centuries. Some philosophers argue that it comes from nature, while others believe it is a product of human society. It may be difficult to determine the origins of ethics, but there are many different views on this subject.

There is no consensus on the origin or nature of ethics or morality, but it has been debated for centuries by philosophers such as Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas in Western philosophy; Immanuel Kant in Eastern philosophy; and Jean-Jacques Rousseau in political theory/social contract theories common today.[1][2]

Debate over these issues continues today among scholars who study various areas including social psychology,[3] evolutionary biology[4], anthropology[5], economics[6], law,[7][8][9] medicine [10](e.g., biomedical ethics), theology[11], politics (e.g., public policy debates), international relations theory[12].

Conclusion

Although the origin of ethics is a complex issue, it does not mean that we should give up on trying to figure out what we should do and how our actions impact others. There are many theories about ethics and morality, but they all relate back to the idea that we must be good people who treat each other with respect.