HLT 317V Week 2 Literature Review Draft

HLT 317V Week 2 Literature Review Draft

HLT317V

Week 2 Discussion 1

What is the meaning of reliability and validity as used in the research process? Provide specific examples of how they are used at your workplace.

Cite at least one reference to support your rationale using APA documentation.

Week 2 Discussion 2

Describe the importance of the Institutional Review Board to the research process.

Cite at least two references to support your rationale using APA documentation.

HLT 317v Grand Canyon Week 2 Assignment

Literature Review Draft

Details:

In this assignment, you will select your final topic using the information you prepared in the “Identification of a Research Topics” assignment and create a literature review. To complete this assignment, do the following:

Select one of the three topics from the “Identification of a Research Topic” assignment.

Utilizing the GCU library, locate three additional articles that will complement and support your specific topic of interest.

In a 1,500-2,000-word paper, utilizing the research process, (refer to your text, Understanding Research) include the following:

1. An introduction to the topic.
2. An explanation of how the literature review is used in research.
3. A discussion of the ethical considerations for data collection.
4. An explanation of what the data reveals in terms of statistical analysis.
5. An evaluation of whether there is enough information to make a decision on the effectiveness of the specific study.
6. A summary of the conclusions from the literature review.

NOTE: Do not submit the assignment to the instructor. Post your rough draft to the Peer Review Forum in Topic 3. You should label your paper with your first name and last name (e.g., Karen Palmer’s Paper).

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

 

 

MORE INFO 

The importance of the Institutional Review Board to the research process.

Introduction

An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a committee of individuals from an institution who have the authority to review and approve research involving human participants. The research must be ethical, and the IRB must ensure that it meets those standards.

An Institutional Review Board (IRB) must review and approve all research involving human participants prior to the initiation of the protocol.

An Institutional Review Board (IRB) must review and approve all research involving human participants prior to the initiation of the protocol. The IRB may grant exemptions from this requirement if you can demonstrate that your study does not include any human participants, uses only non-human biological material, or involves questionnaires rather than interviews.

The IRB will typically require you to submit an application for approval before they can consider your application, although this is not always true. In some cases they will allow you to apply after they have reviewed your site visit report or preliminary results of your work and decide there is no immediate need for further review.

An IRB is charged with safeguarding participants.

The IRB is charged with safeguarding participants. The board must ensure that:

• The study is designed to minimize risk.

• Risks are reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits, and not greater than those ordinarily encountered in daily life or research.

An IRB must determine whether the proposed research is ethical.

An IRB must also determine whether the proposed research is ethical. Members of an IRB are not the only people who can determine whether a study is ethical, though they are often asked to do so. For example, when you apply for your research grant, you will be asked whether your project should be approved by an IRB before starting any work on it. The same applies when considering hiring someone as a lab assistant or researcher; if you want them to have access to sensitive information or perform harmful tasks without supervision, then it’s important that they have approval from someone who knows what they’re doing and has been trained in how best to protect against these risks (like having had experience working with dangerous chemicals).

For any study that includes human subjects, an Institutional Review Board must review and approve the study before it begins.

An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a group of people who review and approve research involving human participants. The IRB must review and approve your study before it begins, ensuring that it is ethical and meets all applicable standards. For any study that involves human participants, an IRB must be consulted before you begin your research project.

The role of an Institutional Review Board (IRB) is to ensure that research conducted at their institution falls within federal regulations and policies related to the protection of human subjects in research studies; they also monitor compliance with these policies throughout the course of each study

Conclusion

The Institutional Review Board is charged with ensuring that human participants are protected when research is conducted. They review the study for ethical considerations and make recommendations on how to proceed. Without the IRB, any research involving humans would not be ethical or safe.